The patients are not going to slap themselves.Yeah. I think of MBenga as more a killer than a healer.
The patients are not going to slap themselves.Yeah. I think of MBenga as more a killer than a healer.
Yeah. If thats the way they want to portray Boyce I've seen enough.So these "writers" bring Boyce back on the show to establish...
1. He was the fake chief medical officer of the Enterprise "The Cage".
2. Instead of the warm advisor who is well-liked, he's actually a raging prick who doesn't get along with anybody on 2 starships.
3. He's a guy who contributes nothing in a crisis and is used to prop up Chapel's character.
4. The most noteable aspect of his character, his friendship with Pike, was nowhere to be found.
So why did the "writers" bring him back and decide to character assassinate him?
Yup. Those killer instincts served spock well that day. LolThe patients are not going to slap themselves.
We are killers but we're not going to kill today.. Those killer instincts served spock well that day
It's edgy.Why do you keep putting writers in quotes?
It's impressive that there are literally no correct words in this post. Including "and" and "the." That's quite a feat.So these "writers" bring Boyce back on the show to establish...
1. He was the fake chief medical officer of the Enterprise "The Cage".
2. Instead of the warm advisor who is well-liked, he's actually a raging prick who doesn't get along with anybody on 2 starships.
3. He's a guy who contributes nothing in a crisis and is used to prop up Chapel's character.
4. The most noteable aspect of his character, his friendship with Pike, was nowhere to be found.
So why did the "writers" bring him back and decide to character assassinate him?
Having actually read some of this comic now? I'd have to say the premise here is waaay goofier than anything that has gone on with M'Benga. And boy howdy, that is saying something.Boyce on SNW can't be worse than this comic cover's take on him
![]()
Oh wait they just transferred that aspect to M'Benga.![]()

I read it years ago on my Star Trek comic collection dvd (sort of miss when you can buy digital comics that weren't tied to some account this way) but don't remember much about it.Having actually read some of this comic now? I'd have to say the premise here is waaay goofier than anything that has gone on with M'Benga. And boy howdy, that is saying something.![]()
Eh. Read that one today; I can say that it's different and much more literal. IDK that I would say that makes it "better" per se. SNW's take is weirder in ways that I think I actually prefer, personally.I read it years ago on my Star Trek comic collection dvd (sort of miss when you can buy digital comics that weren't tied to some account this way) but don't remember much about it.
I do vividly remember their take on the Rigel VII mission was infinitely better than the SNW version.
I read it years ago on my Star Trek comic collection dvd (sort of miss when you can buy digital comics that weren't tied to some account this way) but don't remember much about it.
I do vividly remember their take on the Rigel VII mission was infinitely better than the SNW version.
That was a DC comic while the Early Voyages comic was a Marvel comic. None of the publishers followed the "continuity" of other publishers to my knowledge. By the current situation with IDW, IDW is not even following consistency within its own publishing range (even if you take out situations like Countdown etc where screen continuity overrode what they did, Mission's End and Year Five are not compatible to my knowledge for example)I liked the first mission comic. When pike hands over the enterprise to kirk. So much better than any SNW episode in my opinion.
A random aside, but after you finish reading issue 15 of the Early Voyages comic, check out this video from OTOY. They lifted a scene right out of that comic and recreated it.Having actually read some of this comic now? I'd have to say the premise here is waaay goofier than anything that has gone on with M'Benga. And boy howdy, that is saying something.![]()
That's true but he is one of those left leaning comedian types that has crossover appeal with those on the right.What’s funny is that Stavros is pretty left leaning and is very anti-MAGA.
In the end, yes, Chabon hit him with an idea he liked that wasn't 'TNG Redux' and told him he (Chabon) wanted to get his input to further tailor the show to something he wanted to do.
And folks in the 23rd century can’t change their appearance?"Why change April and make him a black man?"
The dude was in one animated episode produced in 1974. We knew little about him then, we knew little about him when SNW premiered. That's why. And he's better now than he was in that animated episode.
That was a DC comic while the Early Voyages comic was a Marvel comic. None of the publishers followed the "continuity" of other publishers to my knowledge. By the current situation with IDW, IDW is not even following consistency within its own publishing range (even if you take out situations like Countdown etc where screen continuity overrode what they did, Mission's End and Year Five are not compatible to my knowledge for example)
"Why change April and make him a black man?"
The dude was in one animated episode produced in 1974. We knew little about him then, we knew little about him when SNW premiered. That's why. And he's better now than he was in that animated episode.
It's all canon. Whether or not they use it in current Trek is a different matter.I don't know why people had issues with that. Only parts of TAS is Canon. So it is a non issue as far as I'm concerned.
he said a lot of things. Many of which were ignored by the people in charge.Didn't Roddenberry himself say the animated series wasn't canon?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.