Actually it's easily defensible, because we see the decline in digital assets and extra's as the season goes on.
Amazing what someone can do in their backyard with popsicle sticks and tinfoil.@Michael, thank you for your detailed analysis of the shooting locations.

Good point. I look forward to seeing if you're right.Brus Naka seems more like 'Hannibal of Carthage' than 'Hannibal Lecter'.
Any (Psycho-Path/Serial-Killer) portrayals seems to be a giant (decoy/facade/show) for his real "End Game" to isolate the UFP & preventing them from spreading.
I've been thinking about that too. Makes a lot of sense.It’s interesting that unlike previous eras where most threat powers were mainly “monospecies”, in SFA’s time the major non-Breen enemy powers — the Emerald Chain, the Venari Ral — share pretty much the same species as the Federation, including humans. Both personally and politically (and with exceptions), everybody tends to be hybridized now. This seems a fairly reasonable outcome of the previous thousand years — both centuries of increasing crossover within and around the Federation, and a century and a half of isolated mixed populations after the Burn.
Yes! I was really pleased to see that Sam feels more grounded now. I also loved her brief interactions with the Doctor. He's become very protective.Kerrice Brooks' adjustments to her performance as SAM 2.0 were fucking astounding.


Caleb might be the only one.I see I'm not the only person who doesn't trust Caleb's mother.![]()

![]()
"And here's a market on Ukeck we made earlier ..."
Hey, that's Tracy Island!
Following a 1993 toy shortage caused by a Thunderbirds TV revival, the BBC's Blue Peter famously broadcast a guide to building a DIY Tracy Island using household junk. Fronted by Anthea Turner, the iconic, cost-effective make featured a papier-mâché island with a washing-up liquid bottle, loo roll, and yogurt pots, triggering over 100,000 requests for instruction sheets.
Nope, her name is Tracy Island. Like CorporalCaptain said.The presenter is Anthea Turner.
While it’s fun and very informative to point out the actual truths in response to the continual stream of baseless claims, it’s futile in the end. Their goalposts will continue to move at warp speed.At this rate it feels like we could have Noga Landau on here telling you that you're wrong and you'd still claim you're right.
It's also a longstanding issue I have with these shows that threats should escalate over time. This is particularly true in a YA format, where the first antagonist should be someone who's relatively underpowered, to make their defeat by a handful of kids somewhat believable.
I'll freely admit Braka's plan is a bit more small potatoes compared to some earlier seasons of modern Trek. But it's still a greater threat than was faced in 98% of TOS and TNG episodes.
They're cadets, the most they should be doing is third contacts.Quite right . Much of Kurtzman Treks arc based stories all seem to be huge galaxy wide threats. The thing is we already had the burn and several other huge threats now. Whatever happened to exploring strange new worlds and seeking out new life and new civilizations? Even snw rarely explores deep space anymore.

Why explore space when you can torment Spock?
*Blinks in Plato's Stepchildren, among others*Why explore space when you can torment Spock?
Appreciate the honesty at least. I don't know why people insist upon watching things they declare as "bad." That is something I cannot grasp. If Something is bad it is not something I will watch. Period. Time is too short.Well I will say that I am an outsider and not really a fan, you could call me a cynic but Im not really, I am here because I find the show hilariously bad, and I will probably vanish when I grow bored of it.
And I get that. But there is a desire for certain aspects, and then the prejudgement that I have see across quarters of Trek fandom. That's the cynical view: it isn't going in desiring to be entertained but going in demanding that they convince them to be entertained before the actual entertainment begins. It feels like this:Now with the intro out of the way it seems at least to my outsider view that people love certain aspects of the setting and certain versions(tng competency porn is a term for a reason) of it and they will try to get anything close to it and crtique the rest.
There is also the "issue" that people who love the the current series will rightfully gush early at the start about the good parts and well why would I just repeat stuff that has already been said. Not that there isnt double critique and double praise to either write it their way or just tldr the previous stuff.
I just don't see newer Trek lacking diversity, optimism or humanism. In fact, I see way more of it with regards to people who experience trauma and are accepted anyway. I see greater acceptance of people actually being honest with emotions, rather than demanding conformity.As for the spouse part if I was married to trek with its valuing values diversity and optimism and ""humanism"" there are some examples that are jarring for example Kirk at the end of "The Sehlat Who Ate Its Tail"(which has two ways to make it look very bad) I would be very confused if that trek was my spouse and would probably consider a divorce. There has been a lack of empathy for "the other" in recent trek(how the other is dealt with and where the line is is something I just like to fixate on).
at least not here)We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.