Add another note?But then what can I do with my 2000 year and 5000 page timeline with annotations?
Add another note?But then what can I do with my 2000 year and 5000 page timeline with annotations?
![]()
Clearly it was intended to be a window during Where No Man Has Gone Before. Which lines up pretty well with SNW.
Not only pathetic, but nonexistent.
Because the Enterprise never had a widescreen Main Viewer before 2009 --
![]()
Oh.
Maybe you didn't read my post that you quoted, so let me say it again so you can comprehend better...Frankly, I don't see a point to all this handwringing and head-canoning to ensure Discovery isn't part of the precious timeline. It's allowing a show some seem to hate to live completely rent-free in their heads.
The show is in the Prime Timeline whether one likes it or not. All this other squabbling is just a pointless waste of time.
Moving goalposts, thy name is you.It was not a window. You cant seven see through that one.
Not pathetic or nonexistent at all.
Looks like a rectangular viewscreen to me. It wasnt always giant window. Also its larger because its after the refit of the Enterprise. Funny that its less advanced than the snw enterprise during pikes time. Again those dumb choices that kurtzman makes.
Maybe THE ARES can be commanded by Burnham.That's where the Alec Peters fan film idea comes into play.
What's funny is that I can provide other metrics too but you'll ignore them as well.So your entire metric for determining the size of and feelings of the entire fanbase is viewership of a youtube upload of a preview scene? That is an extremely flimsy foundation for an argument.
A remastered 30 year old Turkish song got 15M views under 24 hours.You fail to factor in; not everyone wants to watch youtube videos these days since they are often infested with unskippable ads, not everyone wants to watch a preview and tries to avoid spoilers, older fans who don't use youtube, and people who don't live online and might not even be aware of its existence.
Then prove me wrong with your own metrics.You offer no solid case.
Oh yeah that's why Paramount got gobbled up by Skydance and WB got snatched by Netflix.With content designed to generate views and no substance to back it up. Clickbaits, ragebaits and memes are not an equivalence for comparison.
It was not a window. You cant seven see through that one.
Because it's a fucking model built in the 60s. You can't see through any of the windows.Now we have more.
Dude dates a couple women and he's a whore?![]()
Why does Paramount's business performance concern me? Why do I care about views?What's funny is that I can provide other metrics too but you'll ignore them as well.
A remastered 30 year old Turkish song got 15M views under 24 hours.
A horrible trailer for Predator: Badlands got 3.5M views under 24 hours.
SNW, the most popular of the new Trek shows can barely manage 600K views in over a month.
Then prove me wrong with your own metrics.
Oh yeah that's why Paramount got gobbled up by Skydance and WB got snatched by Netflix.
Cuz of no substantial clickbaits, ragebaits and memes.
A lot of people don't live in reality it seems.

Oh, well that makes all the difference in the world.Three. He has had three open relations on board the Enterprise.

The level of care over fictional character's romance life is even higher than any care my friends and I had over romances in college. I never new fictional romances could dominate thinking so much!Oh, well that makes all the difference in the world.![]()
Moving goalposts, thy name is you.
I have essentially no opinion in this debate, but I do have a large-scale official NCC-1701 model on the table behind me (the one with light-up nacelles from the Star Trek Universe range), and this thread made me look at it and I was shocked to see it actually has no external viewscreen.
Went all the way upstairs and made a racket even though it's 4 AM so I could look at the smaller Corgi model of the NCC-1701 I have upstairs and indeed, no external viewscreen either.
That's got me fascinated, because I'd always assumed it was a window that just doubled as an electronic screen when needed, and let you zoom in and stuff. Was this ever actually mentioned one way or the other during TOS itself?
A window is more primitive than a viewscreen. We have windows now.The windowscreen idea is a pure Kelvin universe idea. I wouldnt have minded it in the 25th century and of course or further out. But they loved it so much they brought it back to the prime 23rd. It makes no sense since now we see a more primitive screen in tng.
Interesting; I can't say it's a retcon I mind too much since I kind of like the idea of having a window into space that can then turn into a full computer display that takes video calls and such when needed. Obviously not a great idea to have a big glass pane facing space, but the ship's covered in windows across its hull so they're playing with fire anywayNo. It was always just a viewscreen we get a good look at how one works per the tng movies...

Especially in situations were the captain orders the blind guy with a magic visor to look out window...I can't say it's a retcon I mind too much since I kind of like the idea of having a window into space that can then turn into a full computer display that takes video calls and such when needed.
DAMN THAT DR. NICHOLS FOR INVENTING THAT THING THAT A TIME TRAVELER GAVE HIM
Can't even garner a million views after a month.
Mid-tier Youtubers collect views bigger than that in a day.
Bro, do you even Star Trek?
You were specifically bitching about the viewscreen size changing as if Star Trek had never done that before, which was a bald-faced lie.How is that moving goal posts?
They even went out of their way to change the size and shape of the windowscreen from what we saw in the size of the viewscreen in tos.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.