Well to be fair picard season 3s Titan had decent corridor lighting and some other areas. The bridge was lit terribly. But once the D bridge appeared onscreen all was right with the world again.
Starfleet Academy Official Trailer
- Thread starter Precious Tritium
- Start date
Well to be fair picard season 3s Titan had decent corridor lighting and some other areas. The bridge was lit terribly. But once the D bridge appeared onscreen all was right with the world again.
Would have been cool to have seen the briefing room or engineering .
i’ve only finally watched the trailer for this and honestly i’m excited. I’m in my first year of uni so it lowkey aligns perfectly with the show, i’m hoping it isn’t necessarily for tweens or just teen angst or anything. I love the idea of starfleet so i’m hoping it actually focuses on that aspect and not too much on personal drama for the sake of it. It comes out when I finish exams, and honestly I need a show to be excited about and invested in and it’s going to be me in my star trek hoodie against the world watching this.
I’m also hoping it doesn’t get too much hate from an older audience when it’s meant for a younger one. Like… they’re trying to make star trek continue into new generations so they need to pivot to those younger people, idk i’m hoping it gets that chance without too many people dogging on it.
Also hoping it doesn’t have that american instagram model uncanny attractive actor vibe that american tv tends to have
I’m also hoping it doesn’t get too much hate from an older audience when it’s meant for a younger one. Like… they’re trying to make star trek continue into new generations so they need to pivot to those younger people, idk i’m hoping it gets that chance without too many people dogging on it.
Also hoping it doesn’t have that american instagram model uncanny attractive actor vibe that american tv tends to have
I would be thrilled if this was the case.
According to Tachyon Pulse, you can expect a lot of teen angst/interpersonal drama. It's also not apparently made for "trekkies" which I take to mean an older audience. According to him, from someone whose already seen the season, it was made to appeal to zoomies. But if you read the vast majority of reactions to the trailers/sneak peeks under the videos, that audience doesn't seem very interested. Might appeal to some of them, but I suspect not many. But who knows - maybe it'll surprise everybody and be okay.
That's where I stopped reading.
Whose lies?
At least you don't have to wait long to find out just who this show was made for. I'm betting the majority opinion that its made for zoomies and is chock full of teen angst is correct. Gentleman's bet?
Tachyon Pulse:
- Said Sony was going to buy Paramount (Didn't happen).
- Missed the Stargate reboot.
The guy's "sources" are blowing smoke in his face.
Apologies the quote function has stopped working but this youtuber is very clearly a liar just making stuff up. There is absolutely zero percent chance he knows someone that has seen the show already.
That's a bold claim. Any concrete reason for it, or is it just "i disagree, so they must be a liar"?
Tachyon Pulse:
- Said Sony was going to buy Paramount (Didn't happen).
- Missed the Stargate reboot.
The guy's "sources" are blowing smoke in his face.
When did clairvoyance become a prerequisite for credibility? Unless there's a credible reason to doubt the source, all that matters is the substance. Attacking the messenger is poor sportsmanship.
There's no reason to trust them. Unearned platform is unearned and can be dismissed just as easily.That's a bold claim. Any concrete reason for it, or is it just "i disagree, so they must be a liar"?
Unless there's a credible reason to doubt the source, all that matters is the substance. Attacking the messenger is poor sportsmanship.
I'll watch the premier, then it depends. If its zoomie angst then no - that kind of content doesn't interest me. If there's something to it, then probably.
As to who cares - well, anyone who wants trek and not 90210, I would guess.
I have Trek.
If people have prejudged it then it will be disappointing no matter what it actually does.
I've never seen more that one episode so I've no idea. what that means. I know it was a drama centered around teens.
It is not doubting the source when it is doubting the very existence of a source.
In order for him to have a source that has seen the entire season it would have to be someone on the production side and not just a simple day worker either. This person would then have to decide to violate their NDAs and put their career in jeopardy and risk legal backlash to share this information with one particular youtuber. A youtuber who does not engage in any official function and one whose track record of claims of inside sources has repeatedly proven to be entirely fictitious.
If deduction is not enough grounds for dismissal then the axiom once a liar always a liar should suffice.
I'm more interested in hearing a credible reason to believe the "source".
A fair critique, especially regarding an insider putting their ass on the line for a small youtube channel.
That said, I looked into the podcast and found nothing to suggest they are liars. Not journalists by any stretch, just opinionated fans like the rest of us. With a channel. And probably some sources.
I looked into the Sony claims made by the podcast and found them to have merit; Sony did publicly express interest in Paramount, with formal bids that made headlines. The podcast also started talking about a stargate reboot in 2024, which were confirmed just recently to be in pre-production, with the reveal having indicated it was being planned 18 months ago.
I don't know the podcast well. I may have watched three or four of their videos. Its entirely possible this forum has experience with it giving bad info. But I couldn't find any.
I get the sentiment though. There are a lot of grifters with channels that claim "insider knowledge" that are full of shit.
Next time I'll start with "random youtuber says" so I don't trigger the forum police
Similar threads
