None of them were in-universe confirmations. We've only had retcons and word of god "records were fragmented" stuff.VOY's Future's End I & II
DS9's Trials And Tribbleations & Past Tense I & II
Star Trek: First Contact
ENT: Regeneration
PIC S2 (All 10 episodes)
...would disagree![]()
Not really a major one since the time period involved had already been called into question by other Trek shows.Not to mention Space Seed established that Khan ruled during the 90s. This was a major retcon.
Did you see a bombed out Earth in the 1996 VOY episode Future's End? I didn't. And per TOS Khan ruled 1/4 of the planet. The other 3/4's were ruled by other Augments and they all fought among themselves and per Spock "Bombed whole populations out of existence."None of them were in-universe confirmations. We've only had retcons and word of god "records were fragmented" stuff.
Heh ... Damn Aliens!The Eugenics Wars were originally described as the last of the World Wars and involved selective breeding. 20th/21st century Star Trek canon has been inconsistent and contradictory since TOS.
I dig that we now know why.
It did come out 41 years ago,Btw while I liked the episode - I still had to laugh out loud when they had that sign with "right: fusion reactor, left: DNA meddling". Hollywood science right there.
Also: That child-room sign written "KHAN" was still 1000x less ridiculous than Spock ugly-cry-screaming that name in "Into Darkness".
Shame that new viewers will miss large parts of backstory/world building. Guess not many casuals will know the backstory from a 1982's movie villain.
All we know for sure is that Khan ruled a quarter of the planet (which doesn't necessarily imply it's landmass, it could also refer to population. If he controlled India and China that's about a quarter of the Earth's population) and that Augments controlled about 40 nations.Did you see a bombed out Earth in the 1996 VOY episode Future's End? I didn't. And per TOS Khan ruled 1/4 of the planet. The other 3/4's were ruled by other Augments and they all fought among themselves and per Spock "Bombed whole populations out of existence."
There was NO CHANCE that somehow teh U.S. was 'sitting it out' and not involved as IT had been conquered and ruled by an Augment as well in the period 1992 -1996 in the Prime TOS timeline.
I just blame it on all the timey wimey shenanigans since then.Not to mention Space Seed established that Khan ruled during the 90s. This was a major retcon.
This completely ignores the fact that several previous Trek shows have put that entire premise into question.No amount of time circles is going to let turning Khan into a child decades after his greatest triumph as an adult make any sense. If they wanted to tell the old "baby hitler" story, then just set the time jump to the 1960s.
while you do not feed Fido a milligram of the same stuff because it kills them
And people are OK with this? They've basically said that TOS never happened and thus it doesn't count anymore. I'd have thought there'd be a tad more vitriol.
its nuanced: according to this episode (but also the Abrams movies) the timeline gradually repairs itself, so the divergence point is in the late 90s, but the two timelines gradually become more and more similar after a while. The TOS we saw as it was was clearly the one with WW3 in the 90s, but most of it happens virtually unchanged in the new timeline as well. By the time of TNG, one century later, the changes are even less and it would be really difficult to find the differences between the two timelines.The problem is that there is no clear "cutoff" divergence point on which Trek works exactly take place in the 1990s Eugenics War timeline and which Trek works take place in the 21st century Eugenics War Timeline. Fans are going to go crazy trying to figure that one out.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.