But some of that is random chance. If a parent forces personal characteristics onto their child, how is that arguably any different than a parent in the here and now that might force a gender onto a child or a sexual orientation?
I think Deep Space Nine presents the flip-side of this episode, where Bashir's treatment by his parents leaves him resentful of a father and mother who didn't accept him for he was.
True, the idea that Khan and company were genetically-engineered dates back to THE WRATH OF KHAN, not "Space Seed."
It was what we would now call a retcon, which worked because the dialogue in "Space Seed" is vague enough to allow for that interpretation.
I gather that Una’s modifications are not heritable or at least not all of them are. All of the Illyrians in this episode appear human, unlike the Illyrians with ridges in the Enterprise episode. Presumably the human appearance and internal makeup IS heritable. Una passes as human on all scans and is compatible enough to receive a blood transfusion from the human Dr. M’Benga. La’an inherited augmented DNA from one or two ancestors several generations in the past. She is not herself an augment.
Una says something along the lines of there being Illyrians that can hide their modifications and those who can't. I wondered whether that was a nod to the Illyrians on Enterprise having a different appearance that might be explained by modifications?
Another thing I noticed is that the Federation ban is worded to outlaw "permanent" modifications. So, presumably, if the modifications are temporary, that might fly under Federation law.
Illyrians are allowed in the Federation, as long as they stop performing genetic alterations. This was explained with Una's colony.It's also odd that they'd allow Neera to represent her in the first place, considering the Federation presumably sees her very existence as illegal.
Una and Neera's feud-- Neera could never understand why Una didn't become a lawyer like her, which apparently is legally allowed for augments, and joined up with the one organization that didn't allow augments.It's also odd that they'd allow Neera to represent her in the first place, considering the Federation presumably sees her very existence as illegal.
James Kirk: I'm laughing at the 'superior intellect'.Also, I didn't think about it until now, but one unintended side effect of the twist at the end of Una being the one to turn herself in is that she basically put her crew and Pike in danger of her own volition.
Presumably she didn't have the asylum defense in mind and you could argue that she knew Pike would be fine in this instance since she knows he ends up in the chair eventually, but it's a bit odd. lol
So are they allowed to keep existing modifications? At what point does it stop? With Neera's generation? A certain stardate?Illyrians are allowed in the Federation, as long as they stop performing genetic alterations. This was explained with Una's colony.
From the dialogue the only request from the Federation was to stop doing modifications.So are they allowed to keep existing modifications? At what point does it stop? With Neera's generation? A certain stardate?
IIRC, The Masterpiece was a human colony but not a Federation member.There were TNG episodes (such as the Masterpiece Society) that showed genetic engineering widely used by isolated colonies without tremendous stigma as well. It's really just the decision to make Bashir into an augment that all of this flowed from
But that pecan pie was delicious!Yep. "Selective breeding" and "controlled genetics" can easily mix into the terminology with genetic engineering and DNA resequencing.
The Ilyruian world was not a Federation member either. I would assume that Neera and her kin - GMO Ilyrians - can visit the Federation but cannot become members due to being genetically engineered. It was stated in the episode that the genetic engineering was done gestationally, so the augmentation is not "naturally inherited"So are they allowed to keep existing modifications? At what point does it stop? With Neera's generation? A certain stardate?
can a military organization grant asylum?
Yes, and a real shame that a show made in the nineties committed to the most preposterous, backward addition to the mythology.
It's interesting that other near-future and far-future scifi of note also have genetically engineered humans as a matter of course. In Foundation, they serve only on spacecraft for example. Trek kind of missed the boat
There were TNG episodes (such as the Masterpiece Society) that showed genetic engineering widely used by isolated colonies without tremendous stigma as well. It's really just the decision to make Bashir into an augment that all of this flowed from.
Wasn't it simply Data's rights to body autonomy as a person rather than property?Then please tell me what exactly they prove in the episode. That he was a sentient being? No one really doubt it. Only Maddox, and he was virtually the only one in the Galaxy, and really, it wasn't even the point in the hearing. That he has certain rights as Federation Citizen? It was already decided by a panel of expert for his admission at the Academy.
This is what happened:
No new facts came up during the hearing, absolutely nothing was proven. No one disputed that Data was artificial and intelligent, and the Acts apply to Artificial Intelligences. So what changed Jag's mind?
- The Jag says that Data is a property of Federation because Acts of Cumberland apply here
- Then she say that Acts of Cumberland don't apply here, and she doesn't explain why
I’ve always had the thought that in the 90s, as the potential of genetic engineering started to become more known among the general audience, the Trek production started to realize that it had missed the boat with regard to its futurism in that regard, as in 250+ years it’s highly likely that genetic engineering will be more widespread and everyone will be augmented in some fashion. Fortunately for the Trek writers, the presence of Khan and the Eugenics Wars in Trek’s history gave them a convenient out to say “genetic engineering is bad and illegal, m’kay.”
Oh god, yeah. Please just let him be a Vulcan asshole with a logic stick up his butt.And that Vulcan admiral.What’s his beef?
Christ,if he’s a Romulan plant with his own agenda I will put my boot through the tv.![]()
It's an interpretation yes, but nothing in the episode explains what made the Jag to change her mind. At one point, she just started to babble about "souls" (quite jarring in a secular show like Star Trek), something that had nothing to do with was said during the hearing. Simply, episode's time ran out.Wasn't it simply Data's rights to body autonomy as a person rather than property?
They allow fights to the death on Vulcan.I thought this was a good episode, but I just found it hard to reconcile the federation allowing one of their worlds to put children in jail for something that was done to them by their parents.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.