McCOY: "Smells like burnt bacon had a skunk crawl up inside it and die."
McGIVERS: "That's the sign of a Sikh warrior's diet!!"
McGIVERS: "That's the sign of a Sikh warrior's diet!!"
It’s the blueberry wine. Can make you very sleepy if you’re not used to it.Khan is easily fatigued. Barely a sip and he wants to be excused.
![]()
"I don't like a scene." Fair.
"I don't like a scene because a nurse should not fight." Strange.
"I don't like a scene because it's not Star Trek." Just flat wrong.
And I can only take so many "she's a woman, she's too weak" rationalizations and so many "I know we've never complained about seeing a doctor fight before but THIS TIME" rationalizations before I start suspecting the person giving me a "reason" is either lying to themselves or is blowing smoke up my ass.
Once again, please learn to use the phrase "dog-whistle" correctly. I am not dog-whistling; I am saying that I think at least some people objecting to that scene are dog-whistling.
I'm sorry to report that this just isn't true. But also, you don't have to be a bastion of right-wing hate to feel uncomfortable seeing a black man or a woman kicking ass without understanding your own reaction. Plenty of well-meaning people still have feelings that they won't admit to themselves.
And the hypocrisy of seeing people whine that Christine is a woman and therefore clearly too weak not to break her hands when no one ever laid the same complaint against Kira, Jadzia, or Ezri is very noticeable.
No one's shutting down conversation. It's not happening.
I am not the one picking out this one lousy scene. I have made several posts basically saying, "this one lousy scene does not make or break the episode." Other people are picking out this one lousy scene and turning it into this Big Thing, and frankly that kind of tunnel vision over such a minor part of the episode makes me suspicious about their motivations.
There's nothing pretend about it.
Political collapse can lead to medical industry collapse. Nothing about that seems inconsistent to me.
Sure. Addiction will still happen if you don't seek or refuse treatment. Doesn't mean addiction isn't curable, and it doesn't mean that addiction is a valid reason to ban a substance in the context of a society where addiction is curable if the patient consents.
The question of whether or not addiction still happens is relevant only insofar as it informs us whether or not a substance should be illegal. The legality or illegality of a substance is the primary topic; whether addictions occur is a tangent from that topic.
Given the very long example of Portugal, I think you need to provide more evidence to support that assertion.
And if drugs are not illegal, a huge percentage of their markup goes away. The price drastically falls and therefore the ability of predators and organized crime to profit vastly decreases. Drug prohibition is the best thing to happen to the Mafia and the cartels.
And yet no reasonable person thinks tobacco should be illegal.
No, it's akin to saying I don't want racist police and DAs using drug use as a pretext for oppressing black folk and to saying that the government shouldn't have the right to tell you what substances you can put in your body absent a far more compelling public interest than has been presented in support of drug prohibition so far.
But now we're getting into the weeds and this is probably not the place for that topic. Suffice it to say that the real issue here is that we have no canonical reason to assume that drug use per se is illegal in the Federation.
An observationaly-challenged opinion. A narrow-minded opinion. A boring opinion.NO. Not wrong. An o-pin-ion.
I apologize if I generalized to you. But, yes someone said that "a nurse shouldn't fight."NO. Not wrong. An o-pin-ion.
Also don't think anyone has said a nurse shouldn't fight. I may be wrong, however and I admit that as I've not read every post.
Nah, peak Klingon was DS9. We learned more about them and their culture in that series than in TOS and TNG.
I find most TNG Klingon episodes boring in comparison to DS9.
Klingons were badass in TNG.
what it should be is taxed. which it is, in most countries, anyway. if those taxes are high enough, however, can be debated.I will agree with you that there is no real evidence drug use is illegal in the Federation.
What I will not agree with is 'no reasonable person thinks tobacco should be illegal'. I most definitely think it should be illegal. Unless you believe I am not a reasonable person.
Cigarettes do nothing but get people addicted and kill people. (It's why my grandfather didn't live long enough to even reach retirement age.) Plus, it also affects other people who have never smoked, or do you think the consequences of secondhand smoke are a myth?
It's one thing to be putting bad chemicals and products into your own body. It's quite another to be using such things that have a measureable, proveable hazard on people around you. So yes, I most certainly think it should be illegal.
It's funny you say that because this episode felt the safest for the uninitiated.What I liked about many episodes of S1 is SNW is Entry Level Trek. It's easy to introduce Trek to your girlfriend or new casual viewers by showing them episodes like Memento Mori or Strange New Worlds. I don't think Pelia would really appeal to the uninitiated. Carol's acting choices with that character.. are rather jarring. I could see the casuals wondering wtf they are watching and tune out.
It's an ensemble show. No need for Mount.It isn't that safe when you leave your star (Anson Mount; the show's popular draw) out of the episode.
Nah. Needing Mount is Disco vibes.Definite need for Mount. He's the reason the show exists. His popularity pushed the demand for the Pike spinoff. He brings the charm and charisma moreso than the others.
The show also feels very off-balance without him there. Discovery vibes.
I don't mind him taking a backseat for later episodes in the season, but it definitely feels like a risky choice to have him absent for the heavily-marketed premiere episode of the season.
This episode is exactly what I expected from this season of SNW.Oh the story was definitely predictable. I just generally expected better from SNW. I found most of S1 quite refreshing compared to what came before in streaming Trek.
I will agree with you that there is no real evidence drug use is illegal in the Federation.
What I will not agree with is 'no reasonable person thinks tobacco should be illegal'. I most definitely think it should be illegal. Unless you believe I am not a reasonable person.
Cigarettes do nothing but get people addicted and kill people. (It's why my grandfather didn't live long enough to even reach retirement age.) Plus, it also affects other people who have never smoked, or do you think the consequences of secondhand smoke are a myth?
It's one thing to be putting bad chemicals and products into your own body. It's quite another to be using such things that have a measureable, proveable hazard on people around you. So yes, I most certainly think it should be illegal.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.