I'M on IMDb and these numbers still means little or nothing to me.
It gets worse every year.Amazes me the level of revisionist history that some fans go through in order to try to make a point.
i think star trek brand is intellectually more highly regarded than star wars, however we have not hard intellectual star trek in a long time not since Enterprise...
I stopped reading right there because your claim is utterly ridiculous. Enterprise is one of my top three Star Trek series, but overall I would hardly call it "intellectual".![]()
Indeed. Trek's intellectual status is greatly exaggerated. When it does, it does it well. But, TOS is a broad swath of storytelling possibilities, from basic adventure, comedy, and messaging. But, calling it "high brow" was a rare find indeed. Expecting it on a constant basis is asking for disappointment.One most days Star Trek is middle brow.
In the hands of someone else (i.e. HBO, European tv), those decon scenes could have actually worked.
I can see a scenario where the focus of the decon scenes is on the internal conflict between professionalism and the temptation that comes from being in a physically intimate situation with a coworker with whom you must already spend the vast majority of your life inside of flying tin can. The loneliness and isolation of living aboard a starship probably could induce some feelings of romantic and sexual tension that could be interesting to explore and juxtapose against the demands of professionalism in a highly-visible, semi-public-facing role.
But doing it right would have required a fundamentally different set of creative conceits than American aughts-era network broadcast television allowed. And frankly it would also have required a greater depth of writing than the ENT S1 writing staff possessed; recruiting a lot more women writers, producers, and directors; and ditching the use of the male gaze.
Berman and Braga were clearly more interested in showing off T'Pol's nipple pokies through her T-shirt than they were actually exploring the characters' emotional lives.
They may not have had the right people back then, but its still amazing they did not even try. At least it was more original than recycling an old episode from TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY.
Looking back on it, I’m surprised they didn’t break out the Ferengi style transporters when they did that Ferengi episode for the sake of the male gaze. And then tie that into further transporter anxiety for the crew that they'd lose their clothes.
At the same time, maybe its for the best they didn't remember that.
I mean, let's be clear here. The reason they didn't even try is that the decon scenes were not designed to explore deeper themes or emotions or to further character relationships. The sole purpose of the decon scenes was to contrive an excuse to film attractive women in their underwear having baby oil rubbed on their bodies. The purpose of those scenes was sexual objectification and nothing else.
I mean, let's be clear here. The reason they didn't even try is that the decon scenes were not designed to explore deeper themes or emotions or to further character relationships. The sole purpose of the decon scenes was to contrive an excuse to film attractive women in their underwear having baby oil rubbed on their bodies. The purpose of those scenes was sexual objectification and nothing else.
Thank God no one gave them that idea 20 years ago...!
If that's the only purpose in the story then it fails as part of the story. The decon chamber is just that and a complete failure in any way to add to the story or our understanding of the characters. Meaningless.Nothing wrong with sexual objectification. it is a natural part of life and one of the most realistic part of life. people male gaze, female gaze , have sex and make love. I think star trek showing that is expected.
If that's the only purpose in the story then it fails as part of the story. The decon chamber is just that and a complete failure in any way to add to the story or our understanding of the characters. Meaningless.
Which pretty much the opposite of Enterprise. The characters were lacking and the decon chambers were not additive.No I dont think that is or should only be the part of the story. I think for example why a character like Shatner Kirk became a break out star in the 60s was because he was the complete package. Kirk could be a handsome sexy ladies man with a high school jock like body and still be a good leader and make good decisions
I think what made science fiction characters back in those days like Princess Leia, Uhura, Kirk, Han Solo so beloved was that they were characters that had the whole package.
Which pretty much the opposite of Enterprise. The characters were lacking and the decon chambers were not additive.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.