• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Lt.Kyle

They said that but I wonder how truthful they were being when they said it. I guess only they would know the answer to that question.
 
Hell, James Bond is Scottish and then he's Australian and then he's English...

even Star Trek's Q couldn't keep up with all of that change.
Au contraire, mon ami.
ITK7byQ.gif
 
If this is true then I am not sure the reason used to explain why Nick Lacarno became Tom Paris holds up. 'The First Duty" was written by Ronald Moore and Naren Shankar who were both staff writers.Well Moore was. I think Shankar was but not sure.
It also comes down to how much money may have to be spent. 26ish episodes a year might add up quite a bit, over 10 episodes with a character with more limited time. Though, I have no idea how that actually works so I could be completely wrong.
 
Because they don't want to.

And dude, you don't get away with "hmmm interesting..." You now explain exactly why you find that so interesting, or we have every right to assume that we already know. And it's a pretty ugly look.

Ah i missed this post by you Dennis. Yes I find it interesting. I also would not be ok with M'bengas race being changed.
 
Never understood why Locarno was supposedly irredeemable. Jeri Taylor's once quasi-canonical Pathways gave Paris basically the same backstory (except with him ending up joining a terrorist group after).
 
Never understood why Locarno was supposedly irredeemable. Jeri Taylor's once quasi-canonical Pathways gave Paris basically the same backstory (except with him ending up joining a terrorist group after).

I never understood that either. Locarno seemed like a okay kid that got in over his head but he was still looking at saving the team and basically took the fall for all of them.
 
I think I would have preferred Locarno to Tom Paris. Paris turned me off immediately, but I might have had some interest in his redemption arc.
 
I did like Paris but in the end I feel like they could have did the exact same arc with Locarno.
 
I did like Paris but in the end I feel like they could have did the exact same arc with Locarno.
I came to like him after a while. But he was trying too hard to be the 'bad boy' at the beginning, and RDM just didn't pull it off. Plus, he said something weird and racist to Chakotay in the pilot.
 
Changing a character's race in casting does not make them a different character. Paramount still owes the Roddenberry estate for Robert April.
Actually, Roddenberry was never able to completely acquire the rights to Trek.
Once he walked away from his third season contract with NBC, that stipulation was never again offered nor agreed upon by NBC, Paramount or CBS.
They let him create new shows, but They always retained the exclusive rights to the IP.

Also, any character's created by the writing staff of all the Trek shows remain the property of CBS/Paramount.
They have to pay royalties anytime the original episodes with those characters are shown, but they don't have to pay anything to reuse said characters if They so choose.

Of course, it's different with the music, but that's a contractual thing which has been around for quite some time thanks to the Hollywood Musicians Union (AFM).

As a highlight to that, the exclusive deal NBC/Paramount made with Franz Joseph for the TOS Manual & Blueprints back in 1974, included the stipulation that that material would remain his intellectual property.
 
Last edited:
If this is true then I am not sure the reason used to explain why Nick Lacarno became Tom Paris holds up. 'The First Duty" was written by Ronald Moore and Naren Shankar who were both staff writers.Well Moore was. I think Shankar was but not sure.

Moore wasn't on the Voyager staff until season 6, long after Tom was created.

As for Kyle- I suspect they basically combined the Asian transporter tech from The Cage, and Kyle from TOS, into one character. In-universe, they could be the same guy, they could be adoptive brothers, they could be a married couple... whatever.
 
I am sure the Trek novels will get to the bottom of figuring this guy out but only when the series ends so nothing they write will contradict anything said on the show.
 
Never understood why Locarno was supposedly irredeemable.

I mean, for one thing he never acknowledges or thinks he did the wrong thing. He spends the entire episode of "The First Duty" rationalizing their use of an illegal flight maneuver, covering up their actions, and manipulating the rest of the time into abetting the cover-up. He has some decency insofar as he insists on taking primary responsibility for the other cadet's death and protects the rest of the team as best he can, but the guy never really thinks he did anything wrong.

Jeri Taylor's once quasi-canonical Pathways gave Paris basically the same backstory (except with him ending up joining a terrorist group after).

Same here. To me, Paris is a bit more unforgivable given he basically joined a known terrorist organization.

I for one don't think the Maquis are a terrorist group. I think they're a morally legitimate response to Cardassian civilian militias operating with clandestine Cardassian state support and to which the Federation responded completely half-assedly, and with a legitimate right to secede from the UFP.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top