One of the most linear time travel episodes in Trek was "Visionary(DS9)" and even it had confusing moments and gave us the legendary line uttered by two different Miles O'Briens at the same time: "I hate temporal mechanics."
Um, it's only been mentioned like 100 times. Maybe 1000.I also have a thought about "Time's Arrow". Don't know if this has been mentioned yet. Since the timeline has been changed, "Time's Arrow" didn't happen because General Picard never would've gone back to the 1890s. So Guinan never would've met him back then.
Ha! I love that this "not complicated" explanation requires multiple charts.
But what they DID consider a failure was when a lot of the audience just didn't get something -- when the creative team thought they had transmitted a piece of information, and large numbers of people just didn't get it. That was when feedback would make them feel like they failed. IIRC, all the other showrunners participating agreed with that.
So, by that standard, this timeline plotting was a failure. Yes, yes, I know we have many here eager to crow about their brilliance in getting it immediately, but I'd say there's been at least as many, and probably more, posts baffled by it.
I mean, you can just look at Bus Punk like Vic Fontaine being a real person in the MU. It makes absolutely no fucking sense, but the writers wanted to do it as an Easter egg because they thought it was cool.
I didn't have time to read the millions of posts.Um, it's only been mentioned like 100 times. Maybe 1000.Lack of sleep?
Here's what I didn't like about the Guinan scene:
Ok, it's really the first point that bugged me the most. But the 2nd point suggests that the writers didn't know the origin of the name 10-Forward.
- Guinan didn't feel like the character Guinan. Exacerbated by the fact that she was understandably recast. Just not the same character.
- What's up with the 10 Forward Street thing? It's not like this Guinan knows about 10-Forward on 1701-D nor did she have this bar first and name the one on the Ent. Makes no sense whatsoever.
I read something in one of the Best of Treks that argued the universe would eventually be filled with Enterprises because of the implosion. Every 71 hours an Enterprise would regress in time, only to be replaced by another Enterprise entering standard orbit. World without end. Amen.TOS "The Naked Time," although perhaps confusing in other ways, was pretty straightforward when it came to the parts about time travel. The ship went back in time, and ... it just sailed on through space to next week's episode without any paradoxes.*
* - As far as we know, of course.
This is a much young Guinan who has not yet travelled to 1893 San Francisco as an older woman, nor the Guinan who will be with El-Aurian refugees in 2293 ("Generations"). Obviously, there has been some "to and fro" with Earth over the centuries.
I assumed she left since 1893. Seems odd that she’s still there on 2024.Guinan did NOT travel to 1893 Earth. Guinan travelled to Earth sometime before 1893 and has been there since. She did not time travel back to 1893.
What's up with the 10 Forward Street thing? It's not like this Guinan knows about 10-Forward on 1701-D nor did she have this bar first and name the one on the Ent. Makes no sense whatsoever... suggests that the writers didn't know the origin of the name 10-Forward.
Guinan did NOT travel to 1893 Earth. Guinan travelled to Earth sometime before 1893 and has been there since. She did not time travel back to 1893.
Weeell, I can sort of understand that, but it puts you behind in the discussion.I didn't have time to read the millions of posts.![]()
You know, it's perfectly alright to love the show but admit not everything adds up.Or she likes the name.
I don't.You know, it's perfectly alright to love the show but admit not everything adds up.
Perhaps but I assumed she would have travelled to other planets before going home, which I think is in the delta quadrant so it would take decades to get back.Or Guinan visits Picard on the Enterprise-D between Seasons 1 and 2 and says, "What you need on this ship is a bar. We could put on Deck Ten, right up the front, and call it '10 Forward', just like old times."
(BTW, the similar area on the Enterprise-A, seen in ST V, with the wooden ship's wheel, was supposedly called "5 Forward", but not mentioned in a script.)
She may have been travelling back and forth for centuries.
Ah, but which old times?Or Guinan visits Picard on the Enterprise-D between Seasons 1 and 2 and says, "What you need on this ship is a bar. We could put on Deck Ten, right up the front, and call it '10 Forward', just like old times."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.