The captain threatens to spank a visiting dignitary. True Trek!
To clarify, a visiting head of state.
The captain threatens to spank a visiting dignitary. True Trek!
Much better. 10/10. Would recommend.To clarify, a visiting head of state.
Someone getting repeatedly kicked in the balls qualifies to you as "Trek is back."
Ummm. Okay.
Star Trek would never stoop so low
If you want LD to be different then how is that beneficial to this show as it has been framed as a comedy?
immutable? No one said immutable but you. Every show has a basic theme.
It's not a cheat if it is the literally built in to the concept of the show from the beginning.As noted, there are different ways to write comedy. You don’t have to cheat in exaggerated behavior and situations. You don’t even have to make the show a comedy all the time.
Because that's not what it is.Why shouldn’t LDS be hailed for its innovative approach to Star Trek, animation, comedy?
Those two together almost single-handedly are killing the show.
You want to change Lower Decks from what it is into something that it isn't so you can appreciate it for what it could be? As I said, what you want and what is there just are not going to meet. You will not get steak out of these french fries, it's just not going to happen, but you have a chance elsewhere, including future franchise efforts.As noted, there are different ways to write comedy. You don’t have to cheat in exaggerated behavior and situations. You don’t even have to make the show a comedy all the time.
Yes, the title is Lower Decks. Suppose the idea was to make each season about a different kind of comedy, or to start the way it did but gradually transform the series by changing the animation style and stripping away exaggeration? What if live-action episodes were added also? I’m not saying to ever make it feel like course correction / retooling, but more like the inherent part of the concept. Why shouldn’t LDS be hailed for its innovative approach to Star Trek, animation, comedy? Because it’s supposed to be the part of the menu responsible for bringing in fans of prime-time animated comedy?
No they're not.Those two together almost single-handedly are killing the show.
wasn't this 100% unconfirmed rumor?Star Trek: Ceti Alpha V
As of March of this year, Nicholas Meyer is still pushing it: https://trekmovie.com/2021/03/13/ex...-back-his-ceti-alpha-v-star-trek-mini-series/wasn't this 100% unconfirmed rumor?
I knew I forgot one.and what about prodigy, by the way?
You're worse at predicting the death of things than the guy trying to chuck his father-in-law on the plague cart in Holy Grail.
No they're not.
Tendi is awesome, I love her.I'm referring to the quality of the show, not that it's going to be cancelled.
They're mind-boggingly horrible. The show was poorly conceived from the ground up. 50% of its core four characters are completely annoying and worthless (and also share nearly identical personalities.) Awful, awful writing. Garbage level. Truly staggering. I will probably fast forward through all of their scenes going forward.
Fast forwarding through an entire show? Novel approach, I'll give it that.They're mind-boggingly horrible. The show was poorly conceived from the ground up. 50% of its core four characters are completely annoying and worthless (and also share nearly identical personalities.) Awful, awful writing. Garbage level. Truly staggering. I will probably fast forward through all of their scenes going forward.
You also forgot the Worf based comedy show that Alex Kurtzman himself mentioned.As of March of this year, Nicholas Meyer is still pushing it: https://trekmovie.com/2021/03/13/ex...-back-his-ceti-alpha-v-star-trek-mini-series/
So who knows, really?
I knew I forgot one.
And we're back to mediocrity with "Lower Decks." Started out kinda fun, but man did it get repetitive in the second half. Bleh.
And Tendi is just the absolute worst character. Rutherford may be a total nothing, but Tendi is actively and deeply annoying and makes the bland Rutherford worse. Those two together almost single-handedly are killing the show.
I seem to remember somewhat predicting not too long ago, that the 'Hate Watchers' would be doing exactly that ... much to CBS/Paramount's delight.I'm referring to the quality of the show, not that it's going to be cancelled.
They're mind-boggingly horrible. The show was poorly conceived from the ground up. 50% of its core four characters are completely annoying and worthless (and also share nearly identical personalities.) Awful, awful writing. Garbage level. Truly staggering. I will probably fast forward through all of their scenes going forward.
Perhaps to be proven right and to mock the dirty masses for daring to like it???I seem to remember somewhat predicting not too long ago, that the 'Hate Watchers' would be doing exactly that ... much to CBS/Paramount's delight.
(they don't really care about your dislike, as long as you continually have your eyes on their product)
I truly don't understand why anybody would watch something they obviously don't like.
There must be some special glee in being able to rip a hated TV show to shreds on a BBS, that escapes me.
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.