That's just factually wrong.
I suspect at least part of the plan was shelved, though I suspect there had to be some coherency from episode 3 on. There are facets that work pretty well leading up to the reveal. Now these last two episodes, I suspect were tacked on, maybe CBS decided (wisely) NOT to end on a cliffhanger.This is demonstrably false. Isaacs himself said when he first began shooting they handed him a script for the third episode, and then immediately told him the script would be pulped and nothing in it was going to be used. The final two episodes were also tacked on late in production when the season was expanded from 13 to 15 episodes. IIRC, they didn't finish filming the last episode before the first episode premiered.
Now, it's true that they are in no way retooling the show on the fly as a result of fan response. But they certainly didn't have a solid plan before filming even started - or if they did, it was abandoned when Fuller left.
He is great on the nerdist but yeah on after trek, I mean.... eh....
It may not be him though. Sometimes a format just doesn't fit certain people, or the pace of it.
Right. Nothing against the guy personally. Just don't think he's suited to this format of show. At least it's not just me thinking this!I tried to watch it twice, but he's just unbearable. Most people have their talents and I'm sure he has his, but hosting a talk show does not seem to be his forte.
Point goes to @eschaton for pointing out the inherent shortsightedness of that particular plot point.Man, this is stupid so far. Really stupid. Lorca is mustache-twirling. Tons of expository dialogue. The absolute worst though is that the TE ship threatens "the whole of all universes." Given there are an infinite number of them, if any one act could cause the mycelial network to die, it would have happened already.
I grimmaced and facepalmed my way through the episode.Meh. Despise what they did to Lorca. He could have been an interesting character in the PU but they had to turn him into a MU cartoon villain. THAT SUCKS.
"SJW" is the new "Mary Sue". No one actually knows what it means, and they use it to describe everything they don't like.I don't care if people don't like DSC, opinion will be mixed and that's part of the territory, but this complaining about "Social Justice Warriors" is getting old.
I really wish Stamets had said, we "overshot by...150 years" as a Sovereign class came into view.
This 1,000,000 times this. Screw the 23rd century.I said the same thing. Have it be the the very late 24th or 25th century, and then keep them there.
Yes. Early Dukat is the way you do a Trek antagonist well.I mentioned on another thread earlier today that I hated what DS9 did with Dukat from Waltz on, basically destroying his complexity as a character to make him into a one-note, mustache-twirling villain.
What Discovery did to Lorca was even worse than that.
Eddington got far less screen time, worked better as a contrast to the main character, and had a much, much better conclusion to his arc.
Eddington was a bit more clichéd than Dukat, but also a good antagonist.Eddington has always been one of my favorite bits from DS9. One phrase I always like to use when people start into the Gene's Vision bullshit is, "Eddington was right." I've always found him to be an under-celebrated character. And a great example of a foil done right.
Michelle Yeoh finally got to show a little of what she can do, and I could believe her kicking anyone's ass.
I'm a sucker for intense martial arts scenes. And for intense martial artists.And you could tell she was holding back to make Jason Issacs not look bad,
Everyone's the protagonist of their own story.The character is a bad guy therefore, is not the hero.
This is demonstrably false. Isaacs himself said when he first began shooting they handed him a script for the third episode, and then immediately told him the script would be pulped and nothing in it was going to be used. The final two episodes were also tacked on late in production when the season was expanded from 13 to 15 episodes. IIRC, they didn't finish filming the last episode before the first episode premiered.
Now, it's true that they are in no way retooling the show on the fly as a result of fan response. But they certainly didn't have a solid plan before filming even started - or if they did, it was abandoned when Fuller left.
I don’t think anywhere did I suggest they could have changed stream in the middle of season 1. I think everyone knows that isn’t possible. I’m merely suggesting that I hope they see that Lorca largely carried the show once he was introduced and that a heavily Burnham centric series without someone like Lorca to lean on probably won’t be long lived.These episodes are shot in advance of them airing.
What do you think they are going to do, halfway through the season just pull 8 episodes and rewrite and reshoot them?
thats what I'm trying to tell some of you. They aren't "pushing" anything on anyone in spite of the idea that the character isn't popular. this was all written, directed, acted, shot, everything. But week to week somr people are actingnlike "here we go again, in spite of the constant complaining on the internet, they decided to give us another michael episode"
and again, I think its a very vocal group, not a large majority doing the complaining about Green and Burnam, that is of course just my opinion. Well see what the end of season ratings are but I doubt thay green or cbs have any real cause for real concern.
I don’t think anywhere did I suggest they could have changed stream in the middle of season 1.
We already knew that from "The Conscience of the King". Could this be what Bryan Fuller was referring to with the "incident in the history of Starfleet that had been talked about but never fully explored" comment?Eh, canon is overrated. Give me a good story. Plus... the Vulcans were apparently conquered.
No it isn't demonstratably false.
If you're telling me the only one not done filming was the very last episode then my entire statement holds true.
They weren't giving you a sjw black woman statement week to week in spite of you conplaining on comment boards as these episodes were already filmed.
You're acting like they just kept deciding to shove it down your throats despite your best efforts to let them know how much you didnt like it.
Seriously they aren't trying to push her as the great one.
Once upon a time, before they cast the show, the wrote a story about these characters. The cadt and crew are simply fulfilling the story. They aren't making this up from one week to the other.
Thats the point you people keep missing. Her continuing to be the maon character isn't a thing they are "pushing" that's just the story that was conceived, casted, and shot.
Frankly I think a lot of people like green and burnham and the ones who are butthurt about her just cry the loudest and whine about SJW this and SJW that.
Yes Isaacs is a great actor. But he cannot and would never have been able to play Michael. He could never have been the lead in this show. If he was the lead it woulda been a different show. what you want, is a different show all together.
It actually seems to be of the same class as the USS Yeager (NCC-1437), the Cardenas-class, that was destroyed at the Binaries.
Yes, as it turns out, I do.what you want, is a different show all together.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.