• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

8x10 In the Forest of the Night (Grading/Discussion) SPOILERS!

Your opinion about the episode?


  • Total voters
    89
(Using chemicals to defoliate? Sorry, if the trees wouldn't burn, why would I expect chemicals to do the trick).

Because the reason the trees wouldn't burn was their ability to control the oxygen in the air. It was explicitly stated. Chemicals don't require oxygen to react.
 
Someone on GB theorized that the reason Clara decided that everyone needed to die is because she believed it would motive the Doctor to think up a solution.

I'm willing to go with this as it at least makes some sort of sense.

What... Like payback for Kill the Moon?xD
I could see that...and that makes me dislike Clara more. Though it graces on Danny's point: World's ending, they're going to die, and she's still playing games rather than admitting / facing the truth.
 
I had to go with Meh on this one. Pretty much had the ending figured out as soon as I heard about fireproof trees and solar flares.
I personally did not, because why the hell would a solar flare threaten the life on Earth?
Given one big enough and strong enough, it could strip our atmosphere away and burn whichever hemisphere was facing the Sun at the time.

Luckily that hasn't happened, and the most we have to worry about is interrupted communications and really pretty auroras.

(Using chemicals to defoliate? Sorry, if the trees wouldn't burn, why would I expect chemicals to do the trick).
Because the reason the trees wouldn't burn was their ability to control the oxygen in the air. It was explicitly stated. Chemicals don't require oxygen to react.
Ah, yeah they do.
So the early Universe couldn't do anything without oxygen?
 
But in today's episode one of the children called her "Miss" and I thought to myself, "Oh shit...". Then the trailer also heavily pointed in a similar direction. Of course, that could be typical misdirection and I do hope it is because otherwise it would devalue a lot of great character moments bewetween her and the Doctor. It would also be a very cruel thing to do.

Agreed, it better not be that for the reasons you state.

Missy's appearance this time was particularly pointless. Why even bother including her. I guess just to show that she's always watching.

Mr Awe
 
I voted "weak". It was bland, forgettable, and had mediocre child actors (although for Doctor who, mediocre child actors are much better than what they usually get for child actors). This is an episode I've watched once, forget about tomorrow, and never watch again.
 
On watch #3. then line about forgetting. Anyone else thinking that maybe Clara will end up forgetting about her time with the Doctor?
 
Meh. It's not a completely bad episode, the first twenty minutes or so are somewhat entertaining even if a bit "been there, done that." But when we get the reveal of the dangerous solar flare mere minutes after learning the trees are fireproof, it becomes very obvious the trees are meant for protection. But the episode drags its ass trying to makes us believe the solar flare spells doom that it makes the second half rather tedious indeed. And how does it take a genius over two thousand years old like the Doctor so long to figure out the blindingly obvious. This isn't a case where the Doctor is intentionally playing up his ignorance for comedic effect, as when he does figure things out, he seems genuinely surprised. "Doctor Idiot" or whatever it is he calls himself indeed. Worse, even Missy seems surprised at the outcome. Maybe she missed the revelation the trees are fireproof?

Just because that was an obvious possibility doesn't mean it's the only one. The trees being fireproof could have simply been their own survival mechanism for the coming apocalypse (or something done to protect the Earth itself). It doesn't automatically mean they were out to protect humanity as well, or that such a thing would even be possible.

Until it was brought up at the end, there was nothing to suggest this so-called "oxygen barrier" would have even existed or been able to help.

Are we really to believe the possibility of the trees trying to protect humanity wouldn't have occurred to either the Doctor or Missy? As I said, I had it figured out as soon as they reveal the solar flares a few minutes after learning the trees are fireproof, and I have an IQ significantly less than the Doctor's is supposed to be, and presumably less than Missy's as well. Now the Doctor we can hand-wave an excuse in as being caught up in the ongoing situation, but Missy? She would have been watching all this on her tablet in the comfort of the Promised Land. How could the idea not have occurred to her? Best I got is she was interrupted and missed the info about the trees.

Missy's appearance this time was particularly pointless. Why even bother including her. I guess just to show that she's always watching.

Actually, you want pointless, there wasn't really much of a need for the Doctor to even be in this episode. The mystery of the forest was the solution to the problem of the solar flares, which he had no involvement in. Those fairy things would have protected the little girl from any real danger, and Danny could have dealt with anything endangering the other kids.
 
The people's motivations here made as much sense as the rest of the plausibility issues. I am not sure that the writer has ever met real people, and I am saying this as someone who hasn't. Everyone, including the Doctor, was syncopatic in this. First, why worry about the potential world-scale disaster brewing or fierce creatures in the forest, when we have children to get home? Then, why be impressed by a TARDIS when there are trees? And don't forget to kill all the children because they'd spend the rest of their lives crying for their parents. And look, I have been a soldier, I don't need to see solar flares. Wow.

Besides, Clara suggested that the TARDIS – which like a big brother of Rhode Island, could easily fit all of humanity inside of itself – could serve as a life boat. It can also time travel so it can collect all of humanity in a jiffy. It has previously moved an entire planet – Gallifrey – to a different reality, and the Doctor cares for Earth just as much (if not more). Clara happens to know all of that. There's no way to explain the whole let us burn, go save yourself, we have to get the children home. What?! WHAAT!? Seriously, WHAT?
I couldn't quite put into words what bothered me about this episode (so I just hand waved it as "meh") but you nailed it right here. Everything that's wrong with this episode.

Ditto! Well said!

That and Danny's speech to Clara really made me dislike him and convinced me he's not right for her. Danny needs to get his own show and stop being such a drag on this one.

Mr Awe
 
The writers definitely haven't done a good job of making Danny likeable. Then again, they don't seem particularly concerned with making the Capaldi Doctor likeable either. It's as if the only person they really want to make likeable is Clara.

I suppose it could be a useful strategy if they're planning to turn the table on us. They could make Clara become the villain and have the Doctor and Danny fight together to stop her. It could act as a turning point for the Capaldi Doctor and Danny characters and create the foundation for a Doctor/Danny season nine minus Clara. Weirder things have happened, after all.
 
The writers definitely haven't done a good job of making Danny likeable. Then again, they don't seem particularly concerned with making the Capaldi Doctor likeable either. It's as if the only person they really want to make likeable is Clara.
Why should any character be likeable? Compelling, sure, intriguing, why not, relatable, yes, but why should they be made likeable?
 
Clara is fine on her own or with Smith. Capaldi has potential, but I haven't seen him click yet with Clara. The writers/producers may need to find Capaldi a new companion who better fits whatever vision they see for this doctor.

I'm still not quite sure what they're doing with the soldier boyfriend. Maybe he'd be better off without his awkward relationship with Clara weighing him down.

Moffat needs to make the Doctor, the title character on this show, the STAR of this show. Not Clara's sidekick. Moffat admitted that Clara is basically the star of the show and that shouldn't be the case. I totally agree that he needs a companion of his own and inheriting Clara was a mistake.
 
(Using chemicals to defoliate? Sorry, if the trees wouldn't burn, why would I expect chemicals to do the trick).

Because the reason the trees wouldn't burn was their ability to control the oxygen in the air. It was explicitly stated. Chemicals don't require oxygen to react.

To be honest, I don't remember that. I might not have been caring by that point.

And magical trees are magical, how would anyone know for certain it would work. It would have been smart to show that it worked, then we would've known for sure.
 
Moffat needs to make the Doctor, the title character on this show, the STAR of this show. Not Clara's sidekick. Moffat admitted that Clara is basically the star of the show and that shouldn't be the case. I totally agree that he needs a companion of his own and inheriting Clara was a mistake.


Hey it worked for Rose.
 
But in today's episode one of the children called her "Miss" and I thought to myself, "Oh shit...". Then the trailer also heavily pointed in a similar direction. Of course, that could be typical misdirection and I do hope it is because otherwise it would devalue a lot of great character moments bewetween her and the Doctor. It would also be a very cruel thing to do.

Agreed, it better not be that for the reasons you state.

Missy's appearance this time was particularly pointless. Why even bother including her. I guess just to show that she's always watching.

Mr Awe

I'm not sure she was pointless this time. We don't know what the point was, but I get the impression it was entirely possible she sent the solar flare.

To be honest, I don't remember that. I might not have been caring by that point.

And magical trees are magical, how would anyone know for certain it would work. It would have been smart to show that it worked, then we would've known for sure.

Well, you don't have to like the episode, but, when you criticize it for plot holes, it's worth considering first if they addressed the issue when you stopped paying attention (which was apparently about five seconds after the trees were shown to be fireproof since that's when it was stated). Sometimes an episode doesn't have plotholes, it's just an episode you don't like.

Maybe they could have shown the defoliating agent being successful (or, given the timing of when things occurred, at least changed "they were trying a defoliating agent" to "they were having success with a defoliating agent."). However, the threat that it could work (with the whole "be nice to trees" commentary) would be enough to cause concern (after all, you don't really want to increase the risk of a massive solar flare destroying Earth).

All that being said, the Doctor's actions in stopping them from using the defoliating agent was the only action he took to save the day. It's the reason criticism that he was passive isn't quite accurate. However, since that was easy to miss, it was probably a good idea to make it more prominent and more clear.
 
I have read comments here and elsewhere. This episode has roiled up some of the viewers, including myself, yet I am sure the appreciation figures will be in the 80s. I would like the show to be centered on the Doctor; however, I think that ship has already sailed.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top