If you like cars that burst into flames.It’s a good car…Elon might steer the Donald from the snake handlers— at least I hope so.
If you like cars that burst into flames.It’s a good car…Elon might steer the Donald from the snake handlers— at least I hope so.
NO.Here's a fun though experiment. Take a great moment from any of the famous episodes and imagine the current crop of writers doing the script.
Example:
I rewatched Yesterday’s Enterprise this afternoon. Imagine if the current writing staff did the dialog for when Rachel Garret soberly tells Picard she's going to go back in time on a suicide mission.
“We going back into the fight Picard, cos Imma bad bitch and I’m gonna tear the Romulans a new one”
Don't forget Autonous Driving AI that will kill the user.If you like cars that burst into flames.
Here's a fun though experiment. Take a great moment from any of the famous episodes and imagine the current crop of writers doing the script.
Example:
I rewatched Yesterday’s Enterprise this afternoon. Imagine if the current writing staff did the dialog for when Rachel Garret soberly tells Picard she's going to go back in time on a suicide mission.
“We going back into the fight Picard, cos Imma bad bitch and I’m gonna tear the Romulans a new one”
Great idea, but three days too early. After I watch Section 31, I'll let you know what I think Garret would say.
Especially Galactica. Can you imagine a Trek show with writers like Ron Moore, Michael Taylor, David Weddle, and Bradley Thompson? That would've been awesome.It was the same back when Enterprise aired. I mean, can anyone with a straight face, really argue that Enterprise could hold a candle to Battlestar Galactica? If I were the show runner, I'd seek out writers that worked on BSG, Better Call Saul, Severance, Silo, Shogun - writers who are smashing it.
Can you imagine a Trek show with writers like Ron Moore, Michael Taylor, David Weddle, and Bradley Thompson? That would've been awesome.
I'm just going to point out that I didn't list Carla Robinson, Seamus Kevin Fahey, Mark Verheiden, Michael Angeli, etc. and let you make your own guess.Tell me you're being sarcastic ...
it's not great but it's still better than insurrection.Sounds like Section 31 isn’t helping the Kurtzman legacy.
it's not great but it's still better than insurrection.
Just because people wrote for Trek in the past doesn't mean they are suitable to showrun it. Bryan Fuller is testament to that. Galactica was designed by Moore to be the anti-trek from the beginning because of his negative experiences writing Star Trek, in particular for Voyager. If Ron Moore was put in charge of a Star Trek series today, you would get something that would be considered 'not star trek'Especially Galactica. Can you imagine a Trek show with writers like Ron Moore, Michael Taylor, David Weddle, and Bradley Thompson? That would've been awesome.
It really suffers from being a series shoehorned into a 90 minute movie. There's a lot of potential there that gets glossed over because the movie literally doesn't have the time to spend on it. But the performances are good and the characters left me wanting to see more of them. I think had it been a series, it would not have gotten the intense backlash it has.That’s something. Not much. But something.
Setting aside my tongue-in-cheek comment where I was literally just listing Deep Space Nine writers, you're absolutely correct. I love Moore's work on Trek, but I suspect if he came back to it I'd be put off by the level of grittiness he puts in many of his other shows since then, which is something that he was held back from doing in Trek.Just because people wrote for Trek in the past doesn't mean they are suitable to showrun it. Bryan Fuller is testament to that. Galactica was designed by Moore to be the anti-trek from the beginning because of his negative experiences writing Star Trek, in particular for Voyager. If Ron Moore was put in charge of a Star Trek series today, you would get something that would be considered 'not star trek'
It really suffers from being a series shoehorned into a 90 minute movie. There's a lot of potential there that gets glossed over because the movie literally doesn't have the time to spend on it. But the performances are good and the characters left me wanting to see more of them. I think had it been a series, it would not have gotten the intense backlash it has.
There’s no need to hate Kurtzman—vote with your feet, stay vocal, and this chapter of Star Trek will likely come to an end sooner than a microbe fleeing from a Vulcan robot’s body.
The flaw with your premise is that Kurtzman is not a showrunner, he's a chief executive.When a showrunner feels so compelled to distance themselves from their creative team, it’s hard to believe they have the franchise’s best interests at heart. Instead, it seems they’re focused on finding the next best way to save face. I don’t blame him for that—it’s what many people with high incomes do when they feel their position is under threat.
I don’t understand why we can’t view the position of a showrunner more in the context of success. When Kurtzman first took the helm, most of us likely supported him. The franchise needed a fresh start, and many were on board with that. However, he never really delivered—almost every piece of Trek content he oversaw in the last decade has been, at best, a mixed bag.
So much of this. His posts are like an old vinyl record that skips on the turntable. Give us something new, man!What's YOUR ideal Trek? What do YOU want to see?
You've sat here trashing Alex Kurtzman. If there's something wrong with Trek, how would YOU fix it?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.