Because if there's anything that displays one's integrity as a psychologist, it's making a conclusive mental health diagnosis about a non-existent person based on 3-5 non-interactive observations of significantly less than 42 minutes each.
"conclusive mental health diagnosis", I quite specifically stated that it didn't mean they were one, but that they displayed an excessive volume of those traits and not much else. And in the context of setting up a show for a greater audience first impressions mean a whole lot.
Also, Breaking Bad and House and countless other popular shows and movies with narcissistic protagonists would like to say "hello".
"popular shows" being the word, as it's clear where they took their lead.
Problem is explaining how that fits into a show like trek.
In House it was the context, it was because he was the only one, in an environment where people had a more traditional more mode of behavior. He was a professional who was both shocking and yet well suited to his environment, because you could really believe he was great at his job.
Breaking Bad is another example, a character starting from a position of respect.
Burnham starts out in prison scrubs. The crew is dystopian, it wasn't just her it was the entire atmosphere.
You edit TV shows frame-by-frame to point out and eliminate certain personality traits that bother you, huh? I think I've identified some of those
extreme personality traits you were looking for.
Traits that bother a wide large group of people actually. I looked at what people said, especially with regards to negative tone/nasty personalities/petty imature bickering, and things like a ship spinning for absolutely no reason.
I gave discovery a chance, I didn't just shit on it because it was different.
I took what I knew about the thing and tried to do my best. And I promise you fixing those initial flaws wasn't near as hard as you imagine.
40 hours by 1 person for 10 episodes, is a good indication of how much they had to work with, and how exactly they screwed it up.
Problem is they over compensated for the first season short comings by going off kilter in an entirely different direction.
The "Joe Rogan demographic." God help us.
You might want to think about what that demographic is, before you assume it's just a bunch of meatheads.
Lex Freidman isn't talking about kettlebells and bongs, and yet somehow his overlap with the rogan fanbase is massive.
You might want to think of the consequences of having 51%+ of men from ages 25-45 moving into an environment because they don't feel like they belong in popular/social media landscape.
Again this is the context, the joe rogan demographic isn't overlaping with the STD audience. And you can see that studios are interested in accelerating that trend.
Dune was fantastic. Not for anything related to whatever the hell all of the above was, though.
It's directly related. For starters it took an IP and didn't turn it into something it wasn't.
It wasn't teen drama dune etc. It acknowledge a demographic and went after it.
It did so many things right, so many things anyone other than Dennei VIllenue wouldn't be able to do.