
I'm honored, thank you!

Actually, this is one of my favorite Voyager episodes. If I'd had the say over Seven's post-Endgame life, I'd have had her recruited by the DTI and given her a series of her own.
For its part, Star Trek Online non-canonically included Wells-class timeships named U.S.S. Pastak, U.S.S. Poh, and U.S.S. Tempus. Star Trek: Coda - Moments Asunder copied the U.S.S. Tempus and also introduced U.S.S. Mobius after August Ferdinand Möbius of Möbius strip fame, U.S.S. Haddix after novelist Margaret Haddix, and U.S.S. Crichton after novelist Michael Crichton.
Not a fan of newer series, or were you merely not apprised? DIS 1.02 introduced the Magee-class U.S.S. Shran (NCC-1413), destroyed in 2256, and PIC 3.01 introduced the Reliant-class U.S.S. Thy'lek Shran, active in 2401.The Shran or Andoria might be good to reaffirm the multi-species Federation. I love the Gorkon, Surak, and T'Plana-Hath.
I appreciated how PIC 3.09 introduced the Sovereign-class U.S.S. Jaresh-Inyo (NCC-75020) named after the Grazerite Federation President from DS9 4.11.Give me one named after the Tellarite Socrates, the Betazoid Alexander, the Tiburonian Bach, or the Bolian Bon Jovi. While we're at it, what's the Deltan word for tolerance, the Aurelian mythical flying lost city of Avalon, or the Medusan Medusa?
I'd also like more names of "historical" figures from our future. Who was the[/a] leading mind of the 22nd century? What was the name of the first, and finest, Secretary General of the New United Nations?
Indeed. I would love a Tokyo-class including the likes of the Shinjuku, Shibuya, Chiyoda, etc.I like tend to like themes for ship names too. For example, for clipper ships (designed for speed) names that suggest speed (e.g. Hermes, Mercury, Chase, Swift, Comet, Shooting Star, Marathon, etc).
I initially read that without one of the "B"s...USS BBS
I initially read that without one of the "B"s...![]()
Still works.
After Chris Rios?USS Rios
I understand where you're coming from, but the reason why there are so many ships with historical names we do know now is to give audiences something to relate to. For some or even many of us, we do have to do a little digging to discover the historical relevance of names like Crossfield, Farragut, Biko, and Essex (just to name a few), but having an actual history that currently exists gives those names a bit more weight and substance behind them, IMO. Sure, we can have ships with names derived after the Federation was formed like Untaari, Iyskarat, Zhikaa, and Thyoi but it would be basically made-up gibberish (like those four names I just came up with).Why not some names we know nothing about, names we've never heard?
There's more to Star Trek history than just what we know now.
I have to think there will be plenty of history in the next 200-300 years before we get to Star Trek time.
They should have legendary people and places and things in their history (that haven't happened for us yet).
I understand where you're coming from, but the reason why there are so many ships with historical names we do know now is to give audiences something to relate to. For some or even many of us, we do have to do a little digging to discover the historical relevance of names like Crossfield, Farragut, Biko, and Essex (just to name a few), but having an actual history that currently exists gives those names a bit more weight and substance behind them, IMO. Sure, we can have ships with names derived after the Federation was formed like Untaari, Iyskarat, Zhikaa, and Thyoi but it would be basically made-up gibberish (like those four names I just came up with).
Can't argue with that.Right on. Just once in a while, sure, throw in a U.S.S. Zhikaa and U.S.S. Thyoi. In a small way, it would open up the ST universe, hinting at the legends of who/what Thyoi was.
That is my misgiving about the decorated captains list in DIS 1.05; it's way too short! You can't tell me nobody in Starfleet was prominent for over half a century between Jonathan Archer and Robert April!Why not some names we know nothing about, names we've never heard?
There's more to Star Trek history than just what we know now.
I have to think there will be plenty of history in the next 200-300 years before we get to Star Trek time.
They should have legendary people and places and things in their history (that haven't happened for us yet).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.