After this episode, I retract what I said about the relationship between Saru and Burnham. Not certain about what happens to her if the season ends with some time travel.
Did she assault her captain, yes or no?of course they can...and would be right. she was sentenced for mutiny, which she clearly hadn't commited. that was a BS sentence in the first place
Sorry, thought you were talking about Kirk there for a second.Did she assault her captain, yes or no?
Did she attempt to take control of the ship after assaulting her captain, yes or no?
mutiny: an occasion when a group of people, especially soldiers or sailors, refuses to obey orders and/or attempts to take control from people in authorityDid she assault her captain, yes or no?
Did she attempt to take control of the ship after assaulting her captain, yes or no?
How the fuck do you think Burnham is a group of people?
insubordination? yes. assault of a commanding officer? yes. mutiny? hell no
justice by walletSentences get commuted. My great grandfather got life for killing a couple of guys, one of them his best friend in a squabble. Back then in this state that meant work in the mines till you died. Family had to pitch in, sell his murkier business interests and make a donation to the governor's campaign. His pardon came in later in the the year. I'm not saying it would be anything that obvious but no doubt they'll find a way.
No wonder its a homo sapiens only clubI think I know why Starfleet tribunals have a shady reputation
commutation of sentence by a tribunal of bigwigs for her actions aboard Discovery, I'm guessing.
When it comes down to it, Starfleet Admiralty allowed an infiltrator (who was sleeping with a member of said Admiralty) to take over one of their ships, kill prisoners and a guard AND coerce the remaining prisoner to work for him. She probably has a lawsuit in there somewhere. Commute her sentence and give her a badge back.
The only reliable way of getting out of trouble in Starfleet is to save the Earth. If Burnham can do that, she's good to go.
do you notice the plural in 'sailors'?MUTINY (noun):
1. revolt or rebellion against constituted authority, especially by sailors against their officers.
I think Michael's actions fit the term well enough.
But Starfleet's not a military!Much as I hate to admit it, @Hythlodeus is technically (albeit anally) correct, in both UK and US military law a mutiny does require at least two persons acting in unison. Otherwise it is merely disobedience.
well, if starfleet isn't military, since mutiny is a military term, then it can't be mutiny anyway. if I go against the wishes of my boss I don't get a life sentence. I might lose my job, but I don't get labeled as mutineerBut Starfleet's not a military!![]()
That's it, I want to see Star Trek reimagined where instead of military chain of command, it's like working in an office.well, if starfleet isn't military, since mutiny is a military term, then it can't be mutiny anyway. if I go against the wishes of my boss I don't get a life sentence. I might lose my job, but I don't get labeled as mutineer
And now I want to see Ricky Gervais as Starfleet captain, The Office styleThat's it, I want to see Star Trek reimagined where instead of military chain of command, it's like working in an office.
Or retail.
I want to see Peter Capaldi in Starfleet, In the Loop style!And now I want to see Ricky Gervais as Starfleet captain, The Office style
That too, yes. Captain Malcom Fucking Tucker HAS to happenI want to see Peter Capaldi in Starfleet, In the Loop style!
Burnham was also convicted of treason, wasn't she? That was an even more BS verdict. If she had actually bothered to retain defense counsel, or at least speak up on her own behalf, she would never have been convicted. She just let the tribunal walk all over her.
If/when her sentence is commuted, I'm sure Starfleet will take that into account as well. Along with her record of service since then.
That reminds me. Even if Burnham didn't ask for a defense attorney, why wasn't she given one anyway? Isn't that an absolute right during any trial - especially a court-martial? It's inconceivable that anyone who is on trial with their career and freedom - possibly even their life - at stake, would not be automatically provided with counsel, even if they didn't ask for it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.