These things happen..."killing a couple of guys"
That must have been one helluva "squabble."
These things happen..."killing a couple of guys"
That must have been one helluva "squabble."
3rd generation family stories, so not worth the retelling. He ran speak-easies in southwest Virginia when the state was dry."killing a couple of guys"
That must have been one helluva "squabble."
of course they can...and would be right. she was sentenced for mutiny, which she clearly hadn't commited. that was a BS sentence in the first place
Which makes me wonder of the legitimacy of the tribunal.Burnham was also convicted of treason, wasn't she? That was an even more BS verdict. If she had actually bothered to retain defense counsel, or at least speak up on her own behalf, she would never have been convicted. She just let the tribunal walk all over her.
If/when her sentence is commuted, I'm sure Starfleet will take that into account as well. Along with her record of service since then.
That reminds me. Even if Burnham didn't ask for a defense attorney, why wasn't she given one anyway? Isn't that an absolute right during any trial - especially a court-martial? It's inconceivable that anyone who is on trial with their career and freedom - possibly even their life - at stake, would not be automatically provided with counsel, even if they didn't ask for it.
Because of poor lighting...I think I know why Starfleet tribunals have a shady reputation
When was he given a life sentence??idk, Riker got his own command and insubordination happened on a weekly basis on the E-D
at the beginning of ST: NemesisWhen was he given a life sentence??
Yeah but when you got a smile like his, it's just too hard to throw the book at him.idk, Riker got his own command and insubordination happened on a weekly basis on the E-D
Her name is MichaelMary-Sue Burnham .
Mary-Sue is far more fitting.
When was he [Riker] given a life sentence??
It took me a second, but then I LOL'ed.at the beginning of ST: Nemesis
Burnham was also convicted of treason, wasn't she? That was an even more BS verdict. If she had actually bothered to retain defense counsel, or at least speak up on her own behalf, she would never have been convicted. She just let the tribunal walk all over her.
If/when her sentence is commuted, I'm sure Starfleet will take that into account as well. Along with her record of service since then.
That reminds me. Even if Burnham didn't ask for a defense attorney, why wasn't she given one anyway? Isn't that an absolute right during any trial - especially a court-martial? It's inconceivable that anyone who is on trial with their career and freedom - possibly even their life - at stake, would not be automatically provided with counsel, even if they didn't ask for it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.