The burn is probably recent, like past 20 years or so at a guess. still see broken ships in the trailer. So a 100 since Danels time would still be okay. But if they have time travel as an option.. why didn't they use it and stop the burn??
Maybe it's part of their Temporal Prime Directive to not seek out information about their future. The same as they won't tell anyone from the past about the future.The burn is probably recent, like past 20 years or so at a guess. still see broken ships in the trailer. So a 100 since Danels time would still be okay. But if they have time travel as an option.. why didn't they use it and stop the burn??
Not necessarily. Space is a vacuum, they should stay there until some scavengers find it, especially if they are in deep space. There could be millions of wrecks out there, they couldn't have cannibalized everything already by the time Discovery arrived.The burn is probably recent, like past 20 years or so at a guess. still see broken ships in the trailer. So a 100 since Danels time would still be okay. But if they have time travel as an option.. why didn't they use it and stop the burn??
No. The Federation existed in Daniels's timeline, he mentions it quite frequently. Granted there has been speculation over the years that the Federation might have fallen or been supplanted by something else in Daniels's time given he always talked about the Federation in the past tense, but it definitely existed and came about in his timeline.I don't remember this, but wasn't the future in Enterprise an alternate timeline where the Federation never came about?
But if they have time travel as an option.. why didn't they use it and stop the burn??
No. The Federation existed in Daniels's timeline, he mentions it quite frequently. Granted there has been speculation over the years that the Federation might have fallen or been supplanted by something else in Daniels's time given he always talked about the Federation in the past tense, but it definitely existed and came about in his timeline.
I suspect your confusing things with Shockwave Part 2, where in the alternate future created as a result of pulling Archer out of the 22nd century in which Earth becomes a post-apocalyptic wasteland, Daniels surmised the Federation must not have existed in that timeline, based on the absence of a monument to the Federation that was supposed to exist outside his apartment building.
That said, if subspace was largely destroyed, wouldn't that affect spore drive travel?
if they have time travel as an option.. why didn't they use it and stop the burn??
from the mid 2260's on, all STD's were known as "the kirk malnuver."The ultimate STD. And yes, I do mean sexually transmitted disease. See they're going for meta, people frequently abbreviate this show as STD, and now a sexually transmitted disease will take down the Federation.
in the star trek time line, bernie sanders won the 2016 presidential elect, and was re-elected in 2020. but was impeached stemming from the sanctuary district scandal in 2024.Feel the Burn.
The burn is probably recent, like past 20 years or so at a guess. still see broken ships in the trailer. So a 100 since Danels time would still be okay. But if they have time travel as an option.. why didn't they use it and stop the burn??
I think they said the mycelial plane is a part of subspace, but maybe it's a part that's not affected by OmegaUnless they specifically said Spore drive uses traditional Subspace in Discovery so far; it is such an exotic form of propulsion there is no reason to think it uses Subspace.
IIRC it has already been said that Discovery is one of the only working ships, which would suggest that "The Burn" is indeed a failure of warp travel, and possibly subspace communication as well.
Presumably it couldn't have happened that long ago - otherwise how would there be so many full-blooded aliens everywhere? Within a few centuries one would presume everyone would just blend together into new races.
Given what we saw in the short trek "Calypso" - if this is that same time period, there's no issue with Warp travel.If 'the burn' is indeed failure of Warp travel... well, it would make more sense the Federation is WAY beyond Warp travel by the 32nd century... or Warp became really fast (outclassing Transwarp and even Slipstream V2 in speed and efficiency).
But then you have transwarp beaming, and a plethora of other options that could be used to zip around the universe even (none of which would need to include spore drive)... however, all of these ARE subspace based technologies.
The spore-drive does not appear to rely on subspace... however, given how subspace is deeply intertwined into Trek technology, you'd think it would have an 'effect' on the spore drive as well.
Meh.. we'll see.
Its possible 'The burn' might refer to subspace being 'burned' in some manner... perhaps similar to what happens with a detonation of an unstable Omega molecule... but Omega DESTROYS subspace (which means it could have either been a coordinated attack to effectively neutralize the Federation, or it may have been part of an unfortunate experiment [although this makes little sense because we've seen that Voyager managed to develop technology to stabilize Omega and use it safely... so even if an explosion of Omega occurred, if it was stabilized, it wouldn't have caused much or any damage - and I'm sure those files would have been declassified at some point]).
At any rate... subspace itself would need to have been affected - but given that Trek sensors are subspace based too, and in the trailer we see Burnham using the red angel suit to scan for survivors (and finding them), its a bit of an iffy subject... unless it was targeted at Starfleet/Federation ships
Given what we saw in the short trek "Calypso" - if this is that same time period, there's no issue with Warp travel.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.