I've heard some people say that "Babylon 5" on the vhs looks better than the dvd's but i'm not sure. It would be interesting to check it out.
Jason
Vinyl records don't have significantly lower quality than the more convenient things that replaced them.
No, that’s not true at all. The issue with B5 on DVD is that the CGI wasn’t rendered at a very high definition, so it looks bad in comparison to the live-action footage, which was rescanned at high def. The CGI is only a small percentage of each episode. The rest looks pretty damn good on DVD.I've heard some people say that "Babylon 5" on the vhs looks better than the dvd's but i'm not sure. It would be interesting to check it out.
Jason
Ahahahaha!
Yeah, no. Plus, new vinyl costs twice as much for half the runtime of a CD.
I made fun of David Mack for making Capt. Georgiou a vinyl nerd in his Discovery novel. As someone who was a major vinyl collector in the ‘70’s, when I had to squirt new records with vinyl preservative before the first play, then instantly recorded them to high-end cassettes for everyday listening (because every play of a vinyl record caused a noticeable degradation of quality) I gotta say that this contention that vinyl is superior to CD is simply nonsensical. Upgrading my music to CD was unbelievably thrilling. You can’t imagine what it was like the first time I listened to Pet Sounds on CD. No scratches, no pops, no needle hiss (and I had an awesome B&O turntable). Just Brian Wilson’s brilliant music.
But vinyl IS strictly inferior to digital, assuming you’re not comparing them to low-def .mp3’s or something like that. Vinyl records aren’t superior to CD’s, they aren’t as good as CD’s; they’re inferior. And every single time you play your vinyl, it gets worse. So, if you have a favorite album that you’ve played 500 times, it is now a scratchy mess. But I have CD’s that I’ve played as many times, and they still sound amazing. I still have (and listen to) the first CD I ever bought (Roxy Music’s Avalon, from 1982). It still sounds great.I didn't say it's superior, I said it wasn't strictly inferior.
AFAIK, there’s no difference, unless it’s an artifact of transferring the content to a different TV standard. In which you’d see a degradation in quality.Are the Dvd's made for America better or inferior than ones made for other regions? Or are they all the same no matter what country you buy Babylon 5 Dvd's?
Jason
But vinyl IS strictly inferior to digital, assuming you’re not comparing them to low-def .mp3’s or something like that. Vinyl records aren’t superior to CD’s, they aren’t as good as CD’s; they’re inferior. And every single time you play your vinyl, it gets worse. So, if you have a favorite album that you’ve played 500 times, it is now a scratchy mess. But I have CD’s that I’ve played as many times, and they still sound amazing. I still have (and listen to) the first CD I ever bought (Roxy Music’s Avalon, from 1982). It still sounds great.
I also have the first 6 movies on VHS that I'll never get rid of. I got the 1st edition releases of all of them (I got the first 3 movies as a birthday gift at a time when TMP was still $39.95 to get on VHS). Those are keepers too.
Really when you think about it Star Trek was a pioneer in home video. At the time the original series was first released on VHS no one really thought about releasing TV shows on home video.
I'm still hoping to someday get that complete set of the 6 movies that has the Enterprise on the side. I have a couple of them, but still no complete Enterprise yet.
no one dared to even try releasing a complete TV show on videotape, season by season. Paramount were very committed, to every Star Trek show being commercially available to the consumer
I know what you're talking about. Some time ago I saw a complete box set of those at a used CD/video store (including the box).
My Star Trek VI VHS is from that set. If I'm not mistaken that's how that movie was released on VHS from the getgo. But my first 5 films are the original 1st release versions that had their own boxes.
Yeah. Paramount was generally pretty smart with Star Trek. They saw there was a definite market there. I first became a Trekkie just before TVH came out and the video rental department at my local Pathmark Supermarket had about 10 or 15 episodes of the 2nd season available for rent and that's how I first started watching the original series. I rented everyone one they had available. I remember having difficulty renting Catspaw, an episode they had in their catalogue but for some reason it was not available. I don't know if someone forgot to return it, I remember one time seeing it on the shelf for rent finally and I took the box up and found out someone accidently put the box on the shelf and they didn't have it for rent. I was really bummed. But my patience eventually was rewarded because eventually it was finally returned. I always have a soft spot for Catspaw to this day because it was one I was determined to see.
I also remember setting my VCR back in the late 80's for Star Trek when WPIX-NY used to show it at midnight. I saw a lot of episodes that way. I lived in the Philly market and none of the TV stations from Philly showed it at the time but luckily my cable operator carried WPIX. I was slowly building up my VHS collection from episodes I bought and got as gifts, and supplemented with the ones I taped from TV. It was nice to see the uncut versions on the videos. Several minutes had to be cut from the TV airings for commercials.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.