• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What is THE Worst continuity error in Trek history..?!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Delta Flyer barely fits through Voyager's shuttlebay doors - yet in "Drive" we see a much larger ship parked next to the Flyer inside the bay (which had double sized for this episode).

kudos to KD. Coming from a tech/gaming forum background, the whole 'canon-size-of-Trek-craft'/'how many shuttles does Voyager have' issue is a big can of continuity worms :).
 
The much larger Excelsior somehow follows the Enterprise outside the spacedock in STIII, despite Enterprise itself just barely fitting through the big doors.
I thought the doors opened just in time for the Enterprise to pass though and they weren't open all the way yet.
 
What about Scotty in TNG's "Relics" and in "Generations"? In "Relics", after he rematerialized and here's about the Enterprise, he assumes that Captain Kirk has taken her out of retirement, but in "Generations", he not only is a guest on a new Enterprise under a new captain, but also witnesses (as best as possible, anyway) the "death" of Kirk.

There's a tiny bit of signal degradation in the transporter buffer, isn't there? Less than .003, I think Geordi says. So althogh Scotty came out pretty much intact, I think he must have lost a few memory engrams, such as the day Jim Kirk died.

Kirk had been dead before - he came back. They never had a body.

Maybe Scotty had a belief Kirk would come back. If so he'd have been proven right after all.
 
- And the fact that Klingon/human first contact led to decades of war lol.. Archer technically made first contact, he even met the then Klingon Chancellor and High Council.

It was never my intention to suggest that the Feds and Klingons went immediately to a hot war as a result of the disastrous first contact, particularly since to the best of my knowledge there was no such canonical war at all prior to the events depicted in "Errand Of Mercy." My thinking was simply that we got off on the wrong foot and things deteriorated from there. I neglected to reckon with the literal-mindedness of a portion of the viewership.
 
What about Scotty in TNG's "Relics" and in "Generations"? In "Relics", after he rematerialized and here's about the Enterprise, he assumes that Captain Kirk has taken her out of retirement, but in "Generations", he not only is a guest on a new Enterprise under a new captain, but also witnesses (as best as possible, anyway) the "death" of Kirk.

Everyone who has replied to this has looked at it from Scotty's point of view while most continuity errors are looked at as something the show did wrong. Well, Relics came out in 1992 and Generations came out in 1994. From the TV show's standpoint, Kirk was still alive. If the dates were reversed then there would be a continuity error.
 
What about Scotty in TNG's "Relics" and in "Generations"? In "Relics", after he rematerialized and here's about the Enterprise, he assumes that Captain Kirk has taken her out of retirement, but in "Generations", he not only is a guest on a new Enterprise under a new captain, but also witnesses (as best as possible, anyway) the "death" of Kirk.

Everyone who has replied to this has looked at it from Scotty's point of view while most continuity errors are looked at as something the show did wrong. Well, Relics came out in 1992 and Generations came out in 1994. From the TV show's standpoint, Kirk was still alive. If the dates were reversed then there would be a continuity error.
The order in which the stories were created doesn't change the fact there is a continuity error. From a continiuty standpoint Doohan shouldn't have been asked to reprise his role of Scotty in Generations because of what "Relics" established (Kirk was alive when Scotty was placed in stasis) Of course because of factors Doohan did get a part in Generations, continuity be damned! Interesting to note that "Relics" and Generations were both written by Ron Moore.
 
What about Scotty in TNG's "Relics" and in "Generations"? In "Relics", after he rematerialized and here's about the Enterprise, he assumes that Captain Kirk has taken her out of retirement, but in "Generations", he not only is a guest on a new Enterprise under a new captain, but also witnesses (as best as possible, anyway) the "death" of Kirk.

Everyone who has replied to this has looked at it from Scotty's point of view while most continuity errors are looked at as something the show did wrong. Well, Relics came out in 1992 and Generations came out in 1994. From the TV show's standpoint, Kirk was still alive. If the dates were reversed then there would be a continuity error.
The order in which the stories were created doesn't change the fact there is a continuity error. From a continiuty standpoint Doohan shouldn't have been asked to reprise his role of Scotty in Generations because of what "Relics" established (Kirk was alive when Scotty was placed in stasis) Of course because of factors Doohan did get a part in Generations, continuity be damned! Interesting to note that "Relics" and Generations were both written by Ron Moore.

Moore knew full well that Scotty was in Relics when he was writing Generations. But he also publicly and blatantly said "fuck it" and included him anyway. Frankly, I'd have to agree -- getting Doohan into the film was more important than any sort of continuity error that only TNG fans would know, out of which only a fraction of whom would really care about.

Now, how Scotty was *handled* in the film is a different topic altogether :)
 
TOS: Janice Lester ""Your world of starship captains doesn't admit women." (Turnabout Intruder)

ENT: ummm, remind again...who was the captain of the Columbia?
 
Speaking of TNG and DS9, the Cardassians in the Wounded look fairly different than in all other appearances. And Marc Alaimo plays a different Gul altogether!

Rather than retconning that one for my fanfic, I wrote it to suggest an ethnic difference between those Cardassians and the ones you see as the vast majority. Sadly, the story comes complete with a near-genocide back in the Hebitian days (think "disastrous first contact" along the lines of what happened to the Native Americans or Australian Aboriginals). As for Macet--in my continuity he is Dukat's cousin; he happens to be multi-ethnic, or in 21st-century terms, biracial.
 
TOS: Janice Lester ""Your world of starship captains doesn't admit women." (Turnabout Intruder)

ENT: ummm, remind again...who was the captain of the Columbia?
The long-held general consensus is that Janice Lester was a nut and that her words shouldn't be taken seriously.

Only because it's convenient for retcon :)

Speaking of TNG and DS9, the Cardassians in the Wounded look fairly different than in all other appearances. And Marc Alaimo plays a different Gul altogether!

Rather than retconning that one for my fanfic, I wrote it to suggest an ethnic difference between those Cardassians and the ones you see as the vast majority. Sadly, the story comes complete with a near-genocide back in the Hebitian days (think "disastrous first contact" along the lines of what happened to the Native Americans or Australian Aboriginals). As for Macet--in my continuity he is Dukat's cousin; he happens to be multi-ethnic, or in 21st-century terms, biracial.

I just saw that episode the other day as working my way through TNG (now on season 4). Huge DS9 fan already and to be honest didn't bother me in slightest, any more than Romulans looks different in TOS. And I was impressed Alaimo made Macet different enough: felt like a first draft sketch for Dukat :)
 
TOS: Janice Lester ""Your world of starship captains doesn't admit women." (Turnabout Intruder)

ENT: ummm, remind again...who was the captain of the Columbia?
The long-held general consensus is that Janice Lester was a nut and that her words shouldn't be taken seriously.

Only because it's convenient for retcon :)
Though one would think that Number One from "The Cage" as an XO would become a Captain (and probably was one by the time of "Turnabout Intruder")
 
The long-held general consensus is that Janice Lester was a nut and that her words shouldn't be taken seriously.

Only because it's convenient for retcon :)
Though one would think that Number One from "The Cage" as an XO would become a Captain (and probably was one by the time of "Turnabout Intruder")

The Cage and Turnabout Intruder do seem to conflict on the whole woman captain issue.
 
I just saw that episode the other day as working my way through TNG (now on season 4). Huge DS9 fan already and to be honest didn't bother me in slightest, any more than Romulans looks different in TOS. And I was impressed Alaimo made Macet different enough: felt like a first draft sketch for Dukat :)

You know, though...I think that the two of them still have very different personalities. Macet is a quieter, think-first-THEN-speak person. His gestures aren't as sweeping, as egotistical and arrogant. You can believe he got stuck having to defend a really, really shitty policy by his government, rather than that he was deliberately trying to screw everyone over. Everything about Dukat's tones and body language is different.

What all three of those first Cardassians did was provide "archetypes" for the varied Cardassian personalities we saw later on. They weren't simply 2-dimensional aliens-of-the-week that you could write off as all being the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top