• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What could have been

Cr0sis21

Captain
Captain
I was thinking today about how a Quentin Tarantino Trek film could have been very interesting.
I found a sneak peek at the movie that, alas, was never meant to be:

507639-1000005160.jpg
 
All joking aside, I’d love to see the script someday, but have to say it’s hard to imagine that it wouldn’t have turned out to be a creative mismatch. Everything I’ve ever enjoyed about Tarantino’s style in every film of his just seems wrong for this franchise, unless he was drastically changing it for this project. I’d still, yes, love to read the script.

(I could see a darkly humorous Klingons-only story done in Tarantinoese, but I gather that wasn’t the plan.)
 
A Piece of the Action, yes, but I think it would have been a completely new timeline rather than Kelvin.
Yes, because Tarantino did not care about the character of Kirk but loved William Shatner.

I do not enjoy his movies either but I thought he’s an epochal artist. What’s wrong with him as a person?
He's a self important narcissistic person who is insensitive to other people's feelings. His portrayal of Bruce Lee was widely critized by people who knew Lee. I would not trust him.
 
I enjoyed Tarantino's movies, especially Reservoir Dogs, but he lately has come off like a self-important hypocrite, and the stories of mistreating actors makes me not really miss this
Having watching Tarantino in many, many interviews over the years, he's always been a self-aggrandizing egotist. Tarantino's movies are weirdly the least obnoxious thing about him, and I say that as someone who loves his filmography.
 
I think it's a huge loss that it never happened. It'd be the most publicity the franchise has had in a long time - hell, the initial reports got more coverage in mainstream press here than I've seen for Trek in years - and I cannot imagine it would be worse than many of the Trek films.
 
Having watching Tarantino in many, many interviews over the years, he's always been a self-aggrandizing egotist. Tarantino's movies are weirdly the least obnoxious thing about him, and I say that as someone who loves his filmography.

i haven't seen Once Upon a Time in Hollywood but I heard it was some level of misplaced nostalgia for a long past era of filmmaking (one he certainly wouldn't have thrived in)

I think it's a huge loss that it never happened. It'd be the most publicity the franchise has had in a long time - hell, the initial reports got more coverage in mainstream press here than I've seen for Trek in years - and I cannot imagine it would be worse than many of the Trek films.

Idk, if it was about the gangster planet, I don't think it would've been that great. Tbh, I never thought the "alien who acts likes Earth subculture" was a great plot to being with
 
Idk, if it was about the gangster planet, I don't think it would've been that great. Tbh, I never thought the "alien who acts likes Earth subculture" was a great plot to being with
Especially since Tarantino has stated he prefers Shatner's Kirk, as well as his trend towards more violence, profanity and such which were considered awful when Discovery and Picard did them so not sure why Tarantino gets a pass?
 
i haven't seen Once Upon a Time in Hollywood but I heard it was some level of misplaced nostalgia for a long past era of filmmaking (one he certainly wouldn't have thrived in)
No. OUaTiH is a legitimately good movie that manages to pull off the feel of 1968/69, but doesn't succumb to the nostalgia and reference bait his prior work had a tendency to do. The late 60's brought about the generation of Coppola, Bogdanovich, Scorsese, Spielberg, Cassavetes, and Polanski - Tarantino definitely would've worked in that New Hollywood system.
 
Especially since Tarantino has stated he prefers Shatner's Kirk, as well as his trend towards more violence, profanity and such which were considered awful when Discovery and Picard did them so not sure why Tarantino gets a pass?
I'm pretty sure the people complaining about profanity in DSC/PIC aren't the same people who would've looked forward to Tarantino Trek.

Even if not, anyone who's sane can recognize it would've been a Tarantino Movie first and a Trek Movie a distant second. And love him or hate him, you know what you're going to get.

If they'd made it, I'd have been supremely disappointed if they hadn't gone completely over-the-top. It might not have been any good, but I won't even pretend I was looking for that. I'd see it, have a good laugh, then move on.
 
Especially since Tarantino has stated he prefers Shatner's Kirk, as well as his trend towards more violence, profanity and such which were considered awful when Discovery and Picard did them so not sure why Tarantino gets a pass?

I never thought the profanity was awful.
Star Trek has been profane ever since Kirk uttered "Let's get the hell out of here."
 
I never thought the profanity was awful.
Star Trek has been profane ever since Kirk uttered "Let's get the hell out of here."
Oh, I don't either. But it's been a big sticking point on not accepting newer Trek or it being "less enlightened " than past Trek, or humans being essentially evolved.

So, I get a sensible chuckle out of the widespread welcome to Tarantino.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top