A Piece of the Action, yes, but I think it would have been a completely new timeline rather than Kelvin.I believe it was going to be the Kelvin equivalent of "A Piece Of The Action".
I do not enjoy his movies either but I thought he’s an epochal artist. What’s wrong with him as a person?I'm glad this never happened, as I do not enjoy Quentin Tarantino movies & I dislike the man.
Yes, because Tarantino did not care about the character of Kirk but loved William Shatner.A Piece of the Action, yes, but I think it would have been a completely new timeline rather than Kelvin.
He's a self important narcissistic person who is insensitive to other people's feelings. His portrayal of Bruce Lee was widely critized by people who knew Lee. I would not trust him.I do not enjoy his movies either but I thought he’s an epochal artist. What’s wrong with him as a person?
Having watching Tarantino in many, many interviews over the years, he's always been a self-aggrandizing egotist. Tarantino's movies are weirdly the least obnoxious thing about him, and I say that as someone who loves his filmography.I enjoyed Tarantino's movies, especially Reservoir Dogs, but he lately has come off like a self-important hypocrite, and the stories of mistreating actors makes me not really miss this
Having watching Tarantino in many, many interviews over the years, he's always been a self-aggrandizing egotist. Tarantino's movies are weirdly the least obnoxious thing about him, and I say that as someone who loves his filmography.
I think it's a huge loss that it never happened. It'd be the most publicity the franchise has had in a long time - hell, the initial reports got more coverage in mainstream press here than I've seen for Trek in years - and I cannot imagine it would be worse than many of the Trek films.
Especially since Tarantino has stated he prefers Shatner's Kirk, as well as his trend towards more violence, profanity and such which were considered awful when Discovery and Picard did them so not sure why Tarantino gets a pass?Idk, if it was about the gangster planet, I don't think it would've been that great. Tbh, I never thought the "alien who acts likes Earth subculture" was a great plot to being with
No. OUaTiH is a legitimately good movie that manages to pull off the feel of 1968/69, but doesn't succumb to the nostalgia and reference bait his prior work had a tendency to do. The late 60's brought about the generation of Coppola, Bogdanovich, Scorsese, Spielberg, Cassavetes, and Polanski - Tarantino definitely would've worked in that New Hollywood system.i haven't seen Once Upon a Time in Hollywood but I heard it was some level of misplaced nostalgia for a long past era of filmmaking (one he certainly wouldn't have thrived in)
I'm pretty sure the people complaining about profanity in DSC/PIC aren't the same people who would've looked forward to Tarantino Trek.Especially since Tarantino has stated he prefers Shatner's Kirk, as well as his trend towards more violence, profanity and such which were considered awful when Discovery and Picard did them so not sure why Tarantino gets a pass?
Especially since Tarantino has stated he prefers Shatner's Kirk, as well as his trend towards more violence, profanity and such which were considered awful when Discovery and Picard did them so not sure why Tarantino gets a pass?
Oh, I don't either. But it's been a big sticking point on not accepting newer Trek or it being "less enlightened " than past Trek, or humans being essentially evolved.I never thought the profanity was awful.
Star Trek has been profane ever since Kirk uttered "Let's get the hell out of here."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.