I like that you're accusing others of taking this too seriously while you're evidently content to write off the possibility that Our Heroes killed a sentient being because you're evidently utterly convinced of your own take on the matter and unwilling or unable to consider the possibility that you may be wrong.
What's more troubling?
Assuming Tuvix was sentient when he actually wasn't, and therefore no murder actually occured
or
Assuming Tuvix was not sentient when he actually was, and therefore what occurred was a form of murder
Pardon some of us for preferring to err on the side of caution.
Was Data a toaster?
What's more troubling?
Assuming Tuvix was sentient when he actually wasn't, and therefore no murder actually occured
or
Assuming Tuvix was not sentient when he actually was, and therefore what occurred was a form of murder
Pardon some of us for preferring to err on the side of caution.
Was Data a toaster?