She fixed a mistake and saved two lives. Errrrr.
Yep, and if she had let Tuvok and Neelix die some folks would be complaining about how she didn't care enough about her crew and how she murdered them blah, blah, blah.
She fixed a mistake and saved two lives. Errrrr.
Yep, and if she had let Tuvok and Neelix die some folks would be complaining about how she didn't care enough about her crew and how she murdered them blah, blah, blah.
Nope. It's much simpler than that: It's always wrong kill an innocent person.
Oh wow. Almost every single thread on this board has something to do with Tuvix these days. People - get over it already, or make an official Tuvix thread or something. Please.
Yep, and if she had let Tuvok and Neelix die some folks would be complaining about how she didn't care enough about her crew and how she murdered them blah, blah, blah.
Nope. It's much simpler than that: It's always wrong kill an innocent person.
But what about two people? Don't Tuvok and Neelix also have the right to continue living?
Why should Tuvix's desire to live outweigh the right for them to continue their lives?
At what point did he become an individual and not a transporter accident?
It cuts both ways, though. It's not a cut and dried situation.
It cuts both ways, though. It's not a cut and dried situation.
Exactly. No one is saying killing Tuvix was okay. At the same time not saving Tuvok and Neelix is also not okay. There is no winning side morally. That's why this is referred to as a no-win situation for Janeway.
If that's not clear I'm going to have to break out the coloring books and crayons and draw some pictures which I just remembered I can't do because I don't own any. (The last ones I bought were for my nephews). So that means I'm done with this topic.![]()
Actually, I've read a few posts commending and celebrating Janeway for murdering Tuvix and Neelix...
Tuvok on the other had seems to be beloved by all.![]()
Terry Shrivo?Depriving an innocent person of his life, however we dress it up, is always immoral.
Terry Shrivo?Depriving an innocent person of his life, however we dress it up, is always immoral.
Innocent? Let's see now, trafficking in stolen organs, false imprisonment, aiding and abetting inSo, it's all right to kill one person to save two? Depriving an innocent person of his life, however we dress it up, is always immoral.But what about two people? Don't Tuvok and Neelix also have the right to continue living?Nope. It's much simpler than that: It's always wrong kill an innocent person.
I'm glad we've come to an agreement of Janeway's intentions in the episode.Terry Shrivo?Depriving an innocent person of his life, however we dress it up, is always immoral.
Well, if we were to argue the Terri Schiavo case, we would be disputing a different issue: heroic measures.
I'm glad we've come to an agreement of Janeway's intentions in the episode.Terry Shrivo?
Well, if we were to argue the Terri Schiavo case, we would be disputing a different issue: heroic measures.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.