I like it.![]()
Yeah, me too.
At least they're not wearing those big goofy hats.I don't like Meyer's "submarine in space" take on the Enterprise and the Buckingham Palace uniforms.
I like it.![]()
Yeah, me too.
Agree. One production design question I had was why they did not replicate the photon torpedo bay rooms from WOK for TUC. It would have been a nice continuity, albeit I know this was the 1701-A, not the 1701-refit.
The main criticism I keep hearing and reading about Star VI was that the Cold War analogy was too obvious. I've never really understood why that is an issue.
The end of the Cold War was obviously a massive event at the time and it is not surprising that films ended up using the theme and trying to send a message.
Why is it such a problem that it was rather obvious? I think it would've been a problem if they had just taken a random theme and forced it into a Trek movie but that's not what happened. I thought the whole movie actually worked quite well. The old heroes who had been fighting Klingons on and off all their lives, there was indeed a Cold War, the end of a generation (the crew retiring, but also Galactic politics changing big time). I thought it all fit the narrative really well. I think it served both as a wonderful send-off for the old crew and also as a turning point that worked to foreshadow the events in TNG (which obviously was already running at the time). That whole "getting old" theme had already started in TWOK and came to a conclusion here. Our heroes weren't just getting old, it was also the world that changed around them big time. In the end they manage to adapt and hand over the torch.
TUC is probably my favourite Star Trek movie. I like the mood, the dinner aboard the Enterprise, the political aspects, the adventure.
Sure, just that most of the people around these parts who are the most vocal critics of the analogy appear to be much, much older than that. And no, not talking about Dennis in this caseSo for some people the Cold War is just a page in a history book as they were born after it ended, so it might give them a different perspective on the use of the Cold War anology in TUC.
The main criticism I keep hearing and reading about Star VI was that the Cold War analogy was too obvious. I've never really understood why that is an issue.
The end of the Cold War was obviously a massive event at the time and it is not surprising that films ended up using the theme and trying to send a message.
Why is it such a problem that it was rather obvious? I think it would've been a problem if they had just taken a random theme and forced it into a Trek movie but that's not what happened. I thought the whole movie actually worked quite well. The old heroes who had been fighting Klingons on and off all their lives, there was indeed a Cold War, the end of a generation (the crew retiring, but also Galactic politics changing big time). I thought it all fit the narrative really well. I think it served both as a wonderful send-off for the old crew and also as a turning point that worked to foreshadow the events in TNG (which obviously was already running at the time). That whole "getting old" theme had already started in TWOK and came to a conclusion here. Our heroes weren't just getting old, it was also the world that changed around them big time. In the end they manage to adapt and hand over the torch.
TUC is probably my favourite Star Trek movie. I like the mood, the dinner aboard the Enterprise, the political aspects, the adventure.
The main criticism I keep hearing and reading about Star VI was that the Cold War analogy was too obvious. I've never really understood why that is an issue.
The end of the Cold War was obviously a massive event at the time and it is not surprising that films ended up using the theme and trying to send a message.
Why is it such a problem that it was rather obvious? I think it would've been a problem if they had just taken a random theme and forced it into a Trek movie but that's not what happened. I thought the whole movie actually worked quite well. The old heroes who had been fighting Klingons on and off all their lives, there was indeed a Cold War, the end of a generation (the crew retiring, but also Galactic politics changing big time). I thought it all fit the narrative really well. I think it served both as a wonderful send-off for the old crew and also as a turning point that worked to foreshadow the events in TNG (which obviously was already running at the time). That whole "getting old" theme had already started in TWOK and came to a conclusion here. Our heroes weren't just getting old, it was also the world that changed around them big time. In the end they manage to adapt and hand over the torch.
TUC is probably my favourite Star Trek movie. I like the mood, the dinner aboard the Enterprise, the political aspects, the adventure.
The TWOK torpedo room had been part of the Klingon bridge in TMP. As I recall from various articles, by the time of TUC, the torpedo bay set had been significantly modified for use in other films and in TNG, so few useable pieces remained.Yeah, me too.
Agree. One production design question I had was why they did not replicate the photon torpedo bay rooms from WOK for TUC. It would have been a nice continuity, albeit I know this was the 1701-A, not the 1701-refit.
I suspect that was due to budget reasons. If I remember correctly initially the budget for TUC was lower than TFF due to that films poor box office but they managed to increase the budget to the same as TFF for TUC.
The main criticism I keep hearing and reading about Star VI was that the Cold War analogy was too obvious. I've never really understood why that is an issue.
The end of the Cold War was obviously a massive event at the time and it is not surprising that films ended up using the theme and trying to send a message.
Why is it such a problem that it was rather obvious? I think it would've been a problem if they had just taken a random theme and forced it into a Trek movie but that's not what happened. I thought the whole movie actually worked quite well. The old heroes who had been fighting Klingons on and off all their lives, there was indeed a Cold War, the end of a generation (the crew retiring, but also Galactic politics changing big time). I thought it all fit the narrative really well. I think it served both as a wonderful send-off for the old crew and also as a turning point that worked to foreshadow the events in TNG (which obviously was already running at the time). That whole "getting old" theme had already started in TWOK and came to a conclusion here. Our heroes weren't just getting old, it was also the world that changed around them big time. In the end they manage to adapt and hand over the torch.
I don't think it's overrated. I think it's really good, and I put it up there with II and IV as among the best of the TOS movies.
I looked quickly at the responses, and I was surprised not to see what I think is a big reason if not the reason for why TUC is regarded so highly - because it came after TFF. I mean, really, anything good that came after that train wreck would be highly regarded. Plus, TUC served to have the TOS crew go out on a high note, capped off by the soaring music and the signatures on screen.
And I hate the taking-a-bow scene at the end.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.