E getting destroyed is quite realistic, even after 25 years. The D lasted 7. Defiant about 3.
So it was okay for TOS to take on the Vietnam War with "A Private Little War," or TNG to do drug abuse in "Symbiosis," but heaven forbid they keep that up today?
Maybe they should just worry about telling entertaining stories sans the 2018 social commentary. Maybe they should have avoided that all along. I look to TV as an escape. I get bludgeoned on a daily basis with real life stuff. I don't need that on my TV shows.
And yes, I understand that some people want that commentary in their TV. I don't
I'm pretty sure they won't be wearing the same uniforms eitherThe reason to replace the Ent-E is that we wouldn't want the designers to be pound to aesthetics designed 20 years ago. Or 30 years ago. It's okay to change the aesthetics, it's the storytelling style that I would want back.
Maybe they should just worry about telling entertaining stories sans the 2018 social commentary.
I'm pretty sure they won't be wearing the same uniforms either
Also would Starfleet give Picard THREE Enterprises?![]()
I just saw this too, and it does provide further information, but little detail on a source.https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/sir-patrick-stewart-talks-return-12778133
Don’t know if this is significant or just recycling what we know already?
And they gave Kirk a refit, that they hadn't planned on giving him, which raises an interesting thought. Why not just a refit of the E? Ultimately it doesn't have to look anything like it originally did, The Constitution didn't. So you design an entirely new ship, & just call it a refit. Problem solvedWhy not? They gave Kirk two, and Picard is better than Kirk.
Personally I want the whole cast back for more of an All Good Things type send off. Nemesis was a terrible way to say goodbye to the characters so anything to fix that would be good in my book. I’m not averse to introducing a few younger characters like the movies did with Decker/Ilia/Saavik to help round things out.
Maybe they would be better off doing a reunion a bit like how Red Dwarf was brought back? That continuation basically reset everything to how the show was in its hey dey as it was assumed the majority of the audience would be familiar with that. It totally ignored the cliffhanger the show had ended on many years before. I don’t necessarily mean decanonise the Trek movies or anything, but just do things like having Data back and don’t bother to explain it and let the audience assume some offscreen adventure occurred to bring him back.
Actually, if this has been in discussion for a while now, I wonder if it’s why the novels have all dried up?
While nobody really fell in love with the Enterprise-E, it is still just as much of a symbol of the prime timeline as Patrick Stewart.
I'd be happy to have the big D back too.
Aside from 2 shots in First Contact, the Enterprise-E was shot with a physical studio model. The only confirmed CGI shot was the temporal vortex, where a low-resolution CGI E was used and then John Eaves believes (but does not quite remember) that the low resolution CGI model was also used for the close-up of the ship as it joins the Borg battle and blocks the Defiant from a Borg attack. https://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Sovereign_class_modelI don't think it's anywhere near as iconic as the D, and certainly not something I associate with the prime timeline. I personally never cared for the E-E. It was a clunky design and badly rendered CG. I never "believed" I was looking at a real ship the way I was with the other Enterprises.
I don't think it's anywhere near as iconic as the D, and certainly not something I associate with the prime timeline. I personally never cared for the E-E. It was a clunky design and badly rendered CG. I never "believed" I was looking at a real ship the way I was with the other Enterprises.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.