I voted C. It had an ok story, but its attempts at humor really fell flat for me (except Thor and Sif talking about Valhalla, that got a chuckle), moments that should have been serious weren't handled well, Gor was just kind of boring and the whole movie felt very weightless in terms of substance. Also, all the kid scenes and the kid power fight and Thor adopting the girl really sucked. Also, taking a piss on the Warriors Three, which they definitely did as a fuck you to the people who complained about their pointless deaths, came off as very petty.
Jane was fine, and I liked her ending. I'm especially glad that Thor didn't lose his actual name, which was the only major problem I had with the comic version of Jane Foster Thor (well, that and Jason Aaron being a mediocre writer, but the name thing was my only problem with the concept itself). The God Council was cool, especially Zeus, I'd like to see them again and hercules looks interesting.
Overall this wasn't a bad movie, but I did feel pretty disappointed in it. I like Taika Waititi, but the fact that he didn't really nail the comedy, which is supposed to be his thing, along with the story just being kind of average has brought down my opinion of him. I think Thor Ragnarok really benefited from him just directing and not writing the script. Its nowhere near being bad, but its disappointing enough that I hjonestly feel that I couldn't really recommend it.
Its very similar to Wonder Woman in that way, a great film outing by a director with a character that goes downhill when they take over writing duties in the sequel, although Taika at his most mediocre is still better then what Jenkins did with WW84.
Jane was fine, and I liked her ending. I'm especially glad that Thor didn't lose his actual name, which was the only major problem I had with the comic version of Jane Foster Thor (well, that and Jason Aaron being a mediocre writer, but the name thing was my only problem with the concept itself). The God Council was cool, especially Zeus, I'd like to see them again and hercules looks interesting.
Overall this wasn't a bad movie, but I did feel pretty disappointed in it. I like Taika Waititi, but the fact that he didn't really nail the comedy, which is supposed to be his thing, along with the story just being kind of average has brought down my opinion of him. I think Thor Ragnarok really benefited from him just directing and not writing the script. Its nowhere near being bad, but its disappointing enough that I hjonestly feel that I couldn't really recommend it.
Its very similar to Wonder Woman in that way, a great film outing by a director with a character that goes downhill when they take over writing duties in the sequel, although Taika at his most mediocre is still better then what Jenkins did with WW84.