I suppose that's fair enough. I am the opposite. As a child I was reading 19th century novels and disappeared into their worlds and the lives of the characters. For me, LotR was detailed enough that I could see the world without needing to watch it on film (I admit I could never make it through The Silmarillian). WoT was that, as well as an equal delve into the characters' hearts, minds, and motives, as well as the cultures, politics, and even economics. For me it ended too soon.
I've watched very few movies that held a candle to novels I'd already read. When I've enjoyed a film first, I immediately get the book and enjoy it more.
I read Sword of Shannara in '77 when it came out. I found it simplistic, boring, and derivative, and never touched the rest of the series. I'm not saying that to be argumentative, just to point out we are far too different to share tastes.