...then you've just rendered the series pointless, if no objective reasoning can be applied.
Not pointless. I'm simply accepting it for what it is: a television show. And every television show is subjective in nature. Events occur at the will of the creators, period. Any attempt to apply objective reasoning to those events, by either of us, is just so much fanboyish nonsense, because no matter what we say or assert, the season will play out the way the writers want it to.
But if you wanna keep going, fine. I got time to spare...
It was luck that Daryl was able to kill the guy. He was unarmed, and we can safely assume the Saviors are just as experienced in fighting as Rick's group, so the only difference is luck. The way things were going, gun-toting Savior had already made up his mind to kill Sasha & Abraham, so if Daryl lost the fight--or the fight called attention of the Saviors, three of the heroes would undoubtedly be dead. That's my point (along with the Carol/Terminus reference)--the heroes never come up with a sound strategy and actually execute it--its always luck and disaster helping them.
But the if's you mentioned didn't happen, so the team won. Whether luck played a part is irrelevant, because luck always plays a part in combat.
The part in bold says it all: if anyone can agree that battle plans will not survive contact with the enemy, then Rick's gang should have expected that (for all they knew, members could have been up, walking the halls), but judging from the outcome, they were exposed to danger several times during the attack, and did not even expect spotters who might--as part of their job--sit in strategic spots around the base.
You're missing the point of the quote, which is that the
unexpected will always happen. You cannot prepare for every contingency, no matter how hard you try, and what destroys the battle plan is the first
unexpected thing you come across. If they had a crystal ball and knew without question that one of the Saviors would be brushing his teeth in the wee hours of the night and prepared for it, something else they didn't prepare for would have happened. It means to be prepared to scrap the plan entirely and come up with a new one on the fly when things break down, not "don't move until you've thought of every possible circumstance."
Moreover, they did not seem to consider that the second gunfire was heard, one or more of the Saviors might have a form of communication (walkies), to alert nearby spotters, or another base.
Which is a moot point if your gunfire kills them before they can press the transmit buttons.
They went in a most reckless manner.
No they didn't. They came up with the best plan they could under the circumstances, executed it, then improvised when it broke down. Nothing they did was reckless.
Then he's got some ill-prepared people on his team, since two were aruging over Maggie's life status at the most inappropriate time. If we take the ZA world as a war situation, would you get into ANY sort of debate while the rest of your unit is moments away from an attack?
I don't know, because I'm not a mother worrying about a future mother being on the battlefield. Maggie and Carol are only human, and humanity can creep in and skew the performance of even the most disciplined fighters. That doesn't make either of them ill-prepared. Just distracted.
Eventually, that loss might include those you are closest to--not ASZ redshirts. Rick can gloss over past ASZ resident deaths such as Aiden, Nicholas, that guy who tried to plot against Rick, or the married note guy, but I doubt he will think its worth it if Michonne, Glenn or Maggie are murdered along the way.
And for the millionth time,
THAT POTENTIAL OUTCOME IS NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO THE POSSIBLE AFTERMATH OF A PREEMPTIVE ACTION!!!!!! Maggie could survive the battle and die in childbirth. Glenn could cut himself planting tomatoes and get an infection. Michonne could come down with cholera. Or, they could sit still, like you want, making all their nowhere plans for nobody, and all die if the Saviors strike first. Rick is not an idiot. I firmly believe he knows that lives close to him are at stake. he's just sure this was the right thing to do...and all the people you're fretting over agreed and went with him!
Similarly, you cannot allow desperation for some imagined (not guaranteed) benefit force you into reckless action without a serious thought toward the possibility of greater numbers, traps or the enemy living in a state where they're always expecting conflict of some kind.
You keep forgetting there was an immediate benefit, food for the ASZ. Payment in advance. That's not imagined. They got the food, they ate the food. They were obligated to keep their end of the bargain, and won a tactical victory, in spite of all your hemming and hawing.