Yes, agreed. I was being a bit cheeky in my original comment and was referring as much to the wearer as to the costume. Sorry.^^ Ummmm... what's ugly about that? ;-)
It was a jumper originally. It has that black mountain around the belly (is that supposed to be the lower-half of the Star Trek logo?). Even as a kid I wondered what was wrong with this costume.
![]()
These guys wore placemats.![]()
(is that supposed to be the lower-half of the Star Trek logo?).
Yep.
THEY ARE ALREADY WEARING THE LOGO! Why not just airbrush the thing on the uniform? Jeez. That's ugly!
![]()
Every time I see that episode, I wonder why she's wearing a fish.
(is that supposed to be the lower-half of the Star Trek logo?).
Yep.
THEY ARE ALREADY WEARING THE LOGO! Why not just airbrush the thing on the uniform? Jeez. That's ugly!
I always felt bad for poor little Jake Sisko..having to wear those jumpsuits and ... yeah... those things were pretty tight in the crotchal region. I feel like a pedophile just watching early DS9s. I'm so glad once he got to a certain age, they gave him 2 piece outfits. Poor kid.
At least Spock got a two-piece uniform for the TMP movie and not this
![]()
To be honest, that belt buckles are a godawful feature, but they are not what caught my eye on this photo.
I never really cared for the uniforms from the TOS movies. (The red ones) They seemed to complicated and they just kind of annoyed me whenever I saw them.
At least Spock got a two-piece uniform for the TMP movie and not this
![]()
ahhhhh yes...........the inexplicable floating belt-buckle....![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.