• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poll The TAS Redux That Might Have Been

Would you have liked a TAS remake in CGI?


  • Total voters
    65
Hi,

Please review the posting rules pinned at the top of this forum, particularly the one about resurrecting dead threads.

I’ll let it slide this time but please don’t do it again.

Thanks!
So sorry- I don’t post often and must have forgotten that one. Honestly was thinking most boards didn’t want multiple threads for the same topic. It won’t happen again.
 
Is it? Because I freaking loved it - other than the reimagined Klingon stuff. That was off-putting. But the new animation completely revitalized the dialog. The edits were choppy - mostly because the creator is making an abridged version - but this is totally on the right track.

Had he/she just stuck with the original Klingon designs and maybe tweaked the voice so it didn't sound like Doohan and then updated the animation as seen, this would be a home run.

Even Uhura's line "well, we could always throw rocks" is now suddenly hilarious because of the decision to not do a closeup. Just a quick rack focus and then back, everyone just ignoring it.

Honestly, as a proof of concept, I would back it. I'd love to see the entirety of TAS redone like this.
Its definitely interesting, but I'm not sure that I liked how they would blur the background or foreground when shifting focus, like it was a real camera.. That was... an interesting choice.
 
Its definitely interesting, but I'm not sure that I liked how they would blur the background or foreground when shifting focus, like it was a real camera.. That was... an interesting choice.
An homage to TMP in all likelihood.
 
It's a rack focus, which is a common technique. TNG used it a lot. Frakes did in First Contact. It's a way of shifting the focus from one character to another without panning or zooming. I think it worked really well here.
I just felt it was a technique that works ok in live action, but seemed a bit off for animation.
 
Rack focus is too often a cheat to get around poor shot composition. </opinion>
I think they usually do it because it looks cool. When something intense is happening and you're in the palm of their hand, it does look cool.

But if not, it can look like the filmmaker calling attention to himself in an attempt to look cool, which takes you out of the story.

JJ-Trek's attempts to look cool can take me out of the story in spots, like having lights shining in your eyes everywhere you look, even though it's supposed to be a room designed for people to work in for hours:

Another focus trick that looks cool in a tense moment is the dolly zoom:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Abusing that one would actually be kind of funny in a comedy. I'll bet it's been done.
 
Yeah, agreed. The prologue adds nothing and spoils the surprise of Cyrano Jones' introduction. It's paced horribly, there are arbitrary changes to the bridge, the new voices sound awful, the designs and likenesses are bad... I had to punch out halfway through.
There's a lot more of that work on YouTube and it's just bad writing and terribly voiced and the pacing is glacial.
 
There's a lot more of that work on YouTube and it's just bad writing and terribly voiced and the pacing is glacial.
Yeah, I watched the rest of them yesterday. It has the usual fanfilm hallmarks of "let's play connect-the-dots" and "fix stuff we don't like" such as giant Spock. Just watching the Tribble episode (where they largely stuck to the original cast recordings) doesn't how how truly terrible the voice work is in the rest of the work. Most of the time it sounds like bad AI-generated slop, plus there are weird decisions,such as Spock sounding like an 80-year old Leonard Nimoy for some reason. I suppose I can forgive the voices, however, since it just seems like one guy is doing the whole project.

I do like the art design for the most part, particularly the character designs, but I can how those who don't like anime styling might be put off. Strangely enough, I seem to be of two minds on some of the choices, or instance, I don't mind the TMP-influenced changes made to bridge consoles and displays, yet I dislike making the Glommer a Pokémon* and the change to the robot cargo ships (even though the latter is entirely inconsequential).

* = even though I thought the scene where it hunts tribbles to the Klingon theme music was cute.
 
Have you guys seen this!? I love it!!

TAS Redux
No, thanks. It's terrible.

I spent a good hour looking at their efforts. There's some good work in the visuals.

However, whenever they stray from the script, the result is invariably terrible in all sorts of ways, not the least of which is the excruciatingly awful voice work, which appears to be done with AI.

Their choices of what elements and/or scenes to replace are also poor.

Hard pass.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top