• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Strange New Worlds Starship Thread™

It was most likely a screw up by someone in their marketing area, who looked up images online of Enterprise and used one of the first ones they saw (probably from the Beyond posters) and matched the nacelle colors.

Honestly, I don't think the general public is zooming into the posters and saying it isn't the one from the series. They see a saucer and 2 engines. To them, it's the Enterprise.
99% sure it was a placeholder not swapped out. Concept art for the sets has crew in ST'09 uniforms so they were using those movies as a basis until new stuff was designed and finalised.
 
I'm pretty sure the Discoprise and the TOS Constellation feature in historical plaques at Starfleet academy in the Picard S2 season opener, so we're in that universe now. To help keep my sanity and both ship versions I'm fond of canon, I've entertained the possibility that Naval Construction Contract 1701 may have involved TWO separate hulls for whatever rationale I've yet to cook up.
The "mk I" launches in 2245 under the command of Robert April. This would be "The Cage" pilot version, resplendent with bussard spikes and oversize bridge dome and deflector dish. Pike takes command before the events on Talos IV. This ship is then mothballed and the crew is rolled over into the "mk II" Discoprise. The mk I then returns to active duty after a prolonged refit program in "Bonhomme Richard" configuration as we know it in TOS. I even double down on this and posit that it's the mk II that returns as the TMP refit.
I've used a similar idea to justify what is obviously the Probert version of the Enterprise C being part of the wall ship display on the Enterprise D. If the original 1701C was destroyed in 2344, and the Galaxy class wasn't in service before the late 2350s at the earliest, then we need a ship to fly the flag in the intervening years, unless we assume a "too soon" tribute gap for the fallen ship and crew.

Ok then...let the vitriol and dismissive comments begin.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure the Discoprise and the TOS Constellation feature in historical plaques at Starfleet academy in the Picard S2 season opener, so we're in that universe now. To help keep my sanity and both ship versions I'm fond of canon, I've entertained the possibility that Naval Construction Contract 1701 may have involved TWO separate hulls for whatever rationale I've yet to cook up.
The "mk I" launches in 2245 under the command of Robert April. This would be "The Cage" pilot version, resplendent with bussard spikes and oversize bridge dome and deflector dish. Pike takes command before the events on Talos IV. This ship is then mothballed and the crew is rolled over into the "mk II" Discoprise. The mk I then returns to active duty after a prolonged refit program in "Bonhomme Richard" configuration as we know it in TOS. I even double down on this and posit that it's the mk II that returns as the TMP refit.
I've used a similar idea to justify what is obviously the Probert version of the Enterprise C being part of the wall ship display on the Enterprise D. If the original 1701C was destroyed in 2344, and the Galaxy class wasn't in service before the late 2350s at the earliest, then we need a ship to fly the flag in the intervening years, unless we assume a "too soon" tribute gap for the fallen ship and crew.

Ok then...let the vitriol and dismissive comments begin.

I prefer the idea that the Constellation is a different class than the Constitution and resembles the TOS Enterprise. The real Enterprise looked like it does in Disco and SNW.

Perhaps when they made the TV show about the Enterprises 5 year mission they could only get an old "Constellation" class ship to represent the Big E, and assumed the viewers wouldn't notice!

Stuart
 
Here's my head canon for why the Discoprise looks different to the SNWprise, which looks different to the TOSprise: refits. Lots of refits.

And the reason why the Enterprise C doesn't match the ship on the Observation Lounge wall: also a refit.
 
Here's my head canon for why the Discoprise looks different to the SNWprise, which looks different to the TOSprise: refits. Lots of refits.

And the reason why the Enterprise C doesn't match the ship on the Observation Lounge wall: also a refit.

Fair enough, though I didn't think there was much left of the 1701C after the battle of Narendra III to refit, and what was got captured by the romulans. The fact that both the TOS and TMP versions of the 1701 show up on the Ent D obs lounge display can be taken as a small inference that they were possibly separate ships, but a refit-fest of one ship is probably the best fit from an Occam's razor perspective.
 
Fair enough, though I didn't think there was much left of the 1701C after the battle of Narendra III to refit, and what was got captured by the romulans. The fact that both the TOS and TMP versions of the 1701 show up on the Ent D obs lounge display can be taken as a small inference that they were possibly separate ships, but a refit-fest of one ship is probably the best fit from an Occam's razor perspective.
I would think it's obvious the refit Constitution in the observation lounge is meant to be the 1701-A.
 
I know who Doug is., I’ve been following him online for over a decade now, all the way back to the original DrexFiles blog. But sometimes he’s got his head stuck in the past. He’s gotten better about it, he no longer dislikes bridge windows.
Then why would you say this Trek ship designer has "no idea what he’s talking about" when he talks about Trek ship design? :shrug:

Also where did I say a 2020s design shouldn’t be futuristic? The discovery Connie is futuristic.
Flimsy looking structures are futuristic. Bulky looking ones, perhaps even looking like today's metal and everyday construction materials, are not.

If the TOS Connie’s materials were supposed to allow for thinner parts, why do most later ship designs ignore that and go for sturdier looking parts? The TMP refit swapped out the pylons for more sturdier looking ones (which by the way originally came from an alternate concept for the TOS Enterprise if Gene didn’t like what we got). Clearly they weren’t that great.
What people above said. Going through just the Enterprises from TOS-ENT, we had thin (TOS), partially thicker (TMP), thin (-B), a bit thicker (C-E). Then the J (by Doug) was very flimsy on purpose because of the monkey brain argument. The most flimsy ships ever gotta be the Klingon D7 and qItI'nga' though. Why would a warrior culture put the weakest, thinnest, flimsiest point right behind the command module and extend the insanely thin neck as long as they did, if the materials aren't futuristically sturdy? The neck got thicker on the BoP, vor'cha and negh'var though.
 
I'm pretty sure the Discoprise and the TOS Constellation feature in historical plaques at Starfleet academy in the Picard S2 season opener, so we're in that universe now. To help keep my sanity and both ship versions I'm fond of canon, I've entertained the possibility that Naval Construction Contract 1701 may have involved TWO separate hulls for whatever rationale I've yet to cook up.
The "mk I" launches in 2245 under the command of Robert April. This would be "The Cage" pilot version, resplendent with bussard spikes and oversize bridge dome and deflector dish. Pike takes command before the events on Talos IV. This ship is then mothballed and the crew is rolled over into the "mk II" Discoprise. The mk I then returns to active duty after a prolonged refit program in "Bonhomme Richard" configuration as we know it in TOS. I even double down on this and posit that it's the mk II that returns as the TMP refit.
I've used a similar idea to justify what is obviously the Probert version of the Enterprise C being part of the wall ship display on the Enterprise D. If the original 1701C was destroyed in 2344, and the Galaxy class wasn't in service before the late 2350s at the earliest, then we need a ship to fly the flag in the intervening years, unless we assume a "too soon" tribute gap for the fallen ship and crew.

Ok then...let the vitriol and dismissive comments begin.
In an age where technological achievements like starships are possible, small changes to pylons and bridge modules strike me as very minor things to achieve, for whatever reason.

Flimsy looking structures are futuristic.
Must have missed that memo when I went to science fiction writing class.
 
Then why would you say this Trek ship designer has "no idea what he’s talking about" when he talks about Trek ship design?
Because he is too slavish to the TOS aesthetic. It does not fit in with the rest of the franchise.

I'm pretty sure the Discoprise and the TOS Constellation feature in historical plaques at Starfleet academy in the Picard S2 season opener
Only the Constellation display was made. The Enterprise only appeared on an early piece of concept art of the displays.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top