• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Strange New Worlds Starship Thread™

The reaction to the eventual TNG “visual reboot” is going to be interesting. I’ve always thought a big part of the reason so many are willing to throw the TOS look out the window is because it’s the oldest series. It’s easier to redo because more people grew up with TNG-ENT. But you redesign the E-D or Discoverse Worf, etc… reaction might be different.

I'm pretty sure the Discoprise and the TOS Constellation feature in historical plaques at Starfleet academy in the Picard S2 season opener, so we're in that universe now.

I think I they made one for the Discoprise but it never made it on screen. The one for the Constellation did. I think.


Here's my head canon for why the Discoprise looks different to the SNWprise, which looks different to the TOSprise: refits. Lots of refits.

And the reason why the Enterprise C doesn't match the ship on the Observation Lounge wall: also a refit.

my head canon is simple, we are watching a different quantum reality, like Worf experienced in “Parallels”. That episode featured thousands of different Enterprise D’s. It’s not impossible to think that the Discoverse was one of those. It’s a reality where technology just evolved in a different way than in the TOS-ENT universe.

doesn’t necessarily change characters or their back stories. Just the tech.
 
Lot of talk about flimsy ship bits here. I think that even by the 23rd century in Trek, force projections like shields and brig containment fields far exceed the strength of physical materials. Things like nacelle support pylons are basically just holding things at an optimal relative location, and aren't meant to endure much compression/shearing/torsional stress outside of external forces acting on the ship, and in that case structural integrity fields would be helping them bear up. Minimizing ship mass may be the more important consideration here.
I think the detached nacelles of the 32nd century are a logical progression of the variable warp geometry setup on the Intrepid class Voyager. As long as the ship has power, the nacelles aren't going anywhere. We can maybe assume a nested configuration for far future ship bits if power levels fall below a certain threshold though.
My monkey brain really lets me down in trying to 2nd guess all the ins and outs of future tech. Try taking a smart phone a few hundred years back in time. You will probably run into common frame of reference problems like being burned at the stake.
 
Last edited:
Once out of curiosity I tried taking the NX-01 design and replaced the Excelsior saucer with a 50s flying saucer, seeing as TOS was a 60s show, and that was the missing ingredient for me. It suddenly looked so much more like a prequel ship, while still having the same basic design. (Though I would've also bulked up those skinny pylons, because it ain't the 23rd century yet mate).
 
The trouble with the TOS aesthetic is that it only looks 20 years more dated than TNG instead of 100, but TNG's designers did their best!
 
The reaction to the eventual TNG “visual reboot” is going to be interesting. I’ve always thought a big part of the reason so many are willing to throw the TOS look out the window is because it’s the oldest series. It’s easier to redo because more people grew up with TNG-ENT. But you redesign the E-D or Discoverse Worf, etc… reaction might be different.
The changelings will say: About time, it's not the 80s anymore! Then the continuum will say: Well is it also not the 2020s anymore? And the changelings will respond: Oh that was just for a few episodes, you can't make a whole series like that. They'll explain that materials and methods are completely different now, and that it's all irrelevant window dressing and necessary change at the same time. In the end it turns out they don't even see the differences themselves.
;) :D
 
TNG already had a visual reboot when they changed the carpet, took the black cardboard off the back computer screens and turned the lighting up.
 
The trouble with the TOS aesthetic is that it only looks 20 years more dated than TNG instead of 100, but TNG's designers did their best!
Pretty much except for the hotel lobby that was the 1701-D Bridge; the majority of the rest of the interior design was all reused sets and set pieces from the various TOS feature films Circa 1979 – 1986
 
But you redesign the E-D or Discoverse Worf, etc… reaction might be different.
Drexler has said Worf in PIC season 3 isn’t a discovery Klingon. Matalas has also said Worf looks like worf.

If they were going to redesign the -D they would hehe done it in Picard.
 
Drexler has said Worf in PIC season 3 isn’t a discovery Klingon. Matalas has also said Worf looks like worf.

If they were going to redesign the -D they would hehe done it in Picard.
That's an assertion supported by the flimsiest of reasoning. No reason to buy it, at all.
 
If they were going to redesign the -D they would hehe done it in Picard.

They did, slightly. Most notably the hull seems to be more detailed and more obviously metallic like Discovery, the deflector dish looks slightly different with truncated sides (but then it already varied within TNG already depending on if the 6ft, 4ft, or 2ft model was being used), and the Bussards have three internal glowing structures each, whereas in TNG they only had two. But yeah, it's barely a redesign compared to, say, the Constitution-class in Discovery.
 
Maybe it's just me, but I've thought Doctor Who always looked cheap and dated as hell. I've tried multiple times to get into the "modern" era of the shoe and I just can't get past how utterly cheap the whole thing feels. And you can say that story is what matters and bla bla bla, but if a show looks like utter garbage, that's a point against it.

Ready to have your mind blown? While original Doctor Who may have looked 'cheap and dated as hell,' it never once reused a ship model or stock footage from past shows or movies to save budget money in the 25+ years it was on the air. Star Trek can't say that, not by a long shot. Which, in my opinion, made Trek look cheap (i.e. the Enterprise-D visiting a brand-new starbase, which was a reuse of stock footage of Regula One from TWOK. Really?)
 
I'd take something new over stock footage any day, even if it's a flying saucer made out of a paper plate. That's how much I hate stock footage.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top