V
Vale
Guest
And yet Jonathan Frakes has repeatedly stated that when contracts were up for renegotiation Paramount's stance was that the Enterprise was the only true and indispensable star of the show... 

Indeed. There is a strong emotional reaction, and I think some writers were a bit more inclined towards the interpretation of the ship as a character than others. But, for the most part, it thrived as a setting, and became a familiar place, not unlike the Brady house. Comfortable but not character.Good for the Japanese.
I loved the live-action Yamato movie, BTW. Without reservation.
But no, to the extent that the notion of a "character" in fiction has any useful meaning at all, Enterprise is not a character. It's a place. No matter how strongly sentimental one feels about it, using the proper terms for things is still a good thing.
I'm not sure taking studio executives at their word during contract negotiations indicating their willingness to walk away from a particular actor is the best argument here.And yet Jonathan Frakes has repeatedly stated that when contracts were up for renegotiation Paramount's stance was that the Enterprise was the only true and indispensable star of the show...![]()
Well as a setting it probably is. Just as St. Eligius and County General are to St. Elsewhere and ER.And yet Jonathan Frakes has repeatedly stated that when contracts were up for renegotiation Paramount's stance was that the Enterprise was the only true and indispensable star of the show...![]()
Yep, it's a negotiation tactic saying you're replaceable. The show's "Star Trek" not "Will Riker's Adventures". Fan rumor has Frakes becoming lead if Stewart left.I'm not sure taking studio executives at their word during contract negotiations indicating their willingness to walk away from a particular actor is the best argument here.
And yet Jonathan Frakes has repeatedly stated that when contracts were up for renegotiation Paramount's stance was that the Enterprise was the only true and indispensable star of the show...![]()
And then they crashed the indispensable star of the show into a planet and replaced her with a new, skinnier one.And yet Jonathan Frakes has repeatedly stated that when contracts were up for renegotiation Paramount's stance was that the Enterprise was the only true and indispensable star of the show...![]()
And then they crashed the indispensable star of the show into a planet and replaced her with a new, skinnier one.
And just as Spock has been recast in SNW, so has the Enterprise. It's no different.In TOS, the Enterprise is as much a character as Kirk, Spock, etc.
Ohhh! Anyone have a pic of this Kongo memorial pin???
Although the USS Kongo was supposed to be in service in 2293... maybe the precursor to the NCC-1710?
Yeah but what could the Enterprise do that Discovery couldn't in Disco S2? The shapes may vary but in-story it's all the same. The Enterprise officers even complimented Disco saying they could tell where Starfleet's pennies were going when they saw the Turbolift Funhouse through the ceiling of a corridorI prefer the idea that there really are only twelve Constitution/Starship class ships like the Enterprise in the fleet at that point, and they're something rare and special.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.