It could have been impulse only due to the energy requirements for the cloak and plasma weapon, with a cloaked carrier on the Romulan side of the NZ. If it had a prototype singularity drive, what happened to the mini black hole when the ship destructed?
Spoilers The Ships of Lower Decks
- Thread starter Tuskin38
- Start date
The mini Black Hole probably ate the ship and left nothing behind.
Ergo no knowledge or tech for the opposition to Salvage.
Probably not enough matter to keep the Black Holes running after it eats what's right around it.
I think STO got it right when it depicted how Romulan StarShips die via internal BlackHole.
So, did anyone else here realize we finally see the interior of the Vulcan warp sled shuttle? Just realized that after watching.
Even If it were a prototype, without have matter to eat, it would start radiating Hawking radiation.
So, going back to "where is a/the shuttlebay?". Crisis Point shows a shuttle entering "a" shuttlebay, plus some other close-up shots of the ship we've never seen before thanks to the TMP/TWOK style flyaround. The MSD we saw had shuttles in the rear of the saucer, but no blatant shuttlebay doors anywhere (outside of the 2 gray squares at the rear L&R of the saucer).
Clearly a LOT more going on with the lower pod than I've ever noticed. Like 6+ decks "more". Is that "a" shuttlebay about mid-level? (and maybe another one below that?)
The curvature and the cut-out area leading up to the door match up.
Clearly a LOT more going on with the lower pod than I've ever noticed. Like 6+ decks "more". Is that "a" shuttlebay about mid-level? (and maybe another one below that?)
The curvature and the cut-out area leading up to the door match up.
I think you’re right. Looks like the lower pod has at least one, maybe two, shuttle bays, making this a very large vessel.
And the ship overall suffers from Bird-of-Prey syndrome of shifting scales.
And the ship overall suffers from Bird-of-Prey syndrome of shifting scales.
Of course, that was from the probably higher-res movie model 
I think you’re right. Looks like the lower pod has at least one, maybe two, shuttle bays, making this a very large vessel.
And the ship overall suffers from Bird-of-Prey syndrome of shifting scales.
Perhaps a subtle dig at the 2009 movie? 366m at the shipyard, 725m for most of the movie (and the official size) but 1200m when the shuttlebay comes outOf course, that was from the probably higher-res movie model
Ha! Another hidden movie reference! 
Perhaps a subtle dig at the 2009 movie? 366m at the shipyard, 725m for most of the movie (and the official size) but 1200m when the shuttlebay comes out
There was a LOT of lens flare in the bridge scenes
I honestly haven't felt a lot of scaling changes, but maybe that's just me. Not a lot of ship porn until this episode.
All Starfleet ships have tesseract interiors?
Dimensionally transcendental.
grummble grummble... have to redo my model... grummble 
StarFleet won't have that "Larger on the Inside" tech like Doctor Who's TARDIS until the 31st century.
Did he reference the MSD having shuttles in the saucer?
There's also bays in the saucer yes. It's the two doors on the back.
Similar threads
