• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Ships of Lower Decks

Back in the day, I was actually hoping for Panasonic’s HDDVD format to win over Sony’s BRD. The compression was arguably better, less lossy, etc., etc. IIRC, BluRay became the standard due to the greater flexibility with interface design features and other interactive capabilities it had that HD apparently didn’t. Personally, I’d take better video quality over fancy main menus any day, but they didn’t ask my opinion when the standards decision was made. Then again, I’m biased, as I’m very much an anti-Sony bigot, so they probably wouldn’t have listened to me anyway. :)
I remember that Paramount/CBS decided to release TOS-R on HDDVD, and I got a sample disc, and just days later, every other studio had committed to BR and so they had to change it all and join the crowd XD
 
Yeah. I was really bummed when that happened. HDDVD got Betamaxed, ironically.

Oh well... In another 10 years or so, we’ll probably see another format war for the next generation of consumer electronics. Maybe 8K or 16K rollable wall screens... True 3D video without the need for special glasses... The next generation is always around the next corner.
 
Yeah. I was really bummed when that happened. HDDVD got Betamaxed, ironically.

Oh well... In another 10 years or so, we’ll probably see another format war for the next generation of consumer electronics. Maybe 8K or 16K rollable wall screens... True 3D video without the need for special glasses... The next generation is always around the next corner.
Which I why I skipped BR as well. The quality gain from DVDs is only important when you pause and look for details, like reading the BTTF newspapers. But that's what screencaps are for and you can find them online.
 
I got 475 meters based off the MSD for the Vancouver, which is longer than the 390 meters Cerritos using the Msd.
Both using 3.5 meters deck height, which is standard Tng height.

(Not joining Facebook to put my quotes up.. hate that place..)
 
Last edited:
For those who don't want to open Facebook
kQXwxbR.png
 
That Parliament-class dorsal view is quite a good-looking profile, although it doesn't seem to be nearly as large and literally overshadowing against the CA class that was portrayed in the episode.
 
I feel like the Parliament-class is the proper design successor to the Miranda Class.

It has all the right design features to seem like a proper evolution.
 
The Nebula was to the Galaxy what the Miranda was to the Constitution, so it's an apt comparison.

I guess you're saying the Parliament is the successor to the Miranda in the role she was doing in the 24th century, not when she was a top of the line ship in the 23rd century.
 
Thing is, they aren't that different. Parliament has a shrunken secondary hull compared to the Nebula.
True:
the Nebula-class has a BIG honkin Deflector Dish between it's Warp Nacelle's
the Parliament-class has a teeny Deflector Dish between it's Warp Nacelle's

A product of their design times I guess, with the Nebula Class having a length of 442.23 meters vs Parliament-class having a length of ~410 meters.

But Nebula-class having a nice wide oval saucer vs Parliament-class having a nice round circular saucer, ergo much narrower.

And alot of dead space behind the Parliament-class due to the Warp Nacelles hanging in the aft in open space while the Nebula Class is compact and efficient within it's design box with not much hanging out.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top