• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The most disappointing Trek Movie..

As we're only looking at movies I - X, I'd say Generations. How do you manage to mess up Picard meeting Kirk?

By letting Picard meet Kirk. The very idea is messed up to begin with.

I read about a script that was written for Generations in which Kirk would only appear in the movie as a holodeck person that Picard would go to for help in dealing with a creature that's damaging our universe. Would you rather have Kirk appear only on the holodeck, thru the Nexus, or not at all?? Just curious...
 
You're talking about what amounts to a 45 minute TV ep. where a massive reset button is pushed at the end and nothing really happened. Picard's pain over losing his brother and nephew were real emotions and it would be selfish of Picard I think to think only of himself. Nor would I want for the first TNG movie to end with a reset button.

Not at all. I'm talking about a stupid, 118-minute motion picture where Picard completely forgot about his pain over losing his brother and nephew once he resolved to go back with his personal bodyguard to fight Soran on Veridian III. In no way, shape, or form am I saying Generations should have shown Picard actually rescuing Robert and Rene ... I'm saying the movie, as scripted, had Picard doing something dumb. That's how bad an idea it was. He could have come out anywhere, anywhen he wanted to, and the exit he chose was a blunder.

I don't think Picard forget them at all in the end he did go back for his photo album. And Picard being a career officer wasn't going to let his grief get in the way his mission ot stop Soran. And gong back to arrest Soran in Ten Forward is still nothing more than pressing a reset button.
 
Star Trek: The Motion Picture is actually my favorite of the series.
If you look at movies from that era like Close Encounters and Superman the movie, you can see the influence of 2001 a Space Odyssey. Special effects were used to draw people into the story and create a believable world. These days, everyone pretty much accepts all kinds of things, even rather fake looking CGI. So if you saw it in a theater back in '79 you may remember that it was rather cool to see Star Trek done in a believable way for the first time. Plus the actors were fairly young.
Star Trek V is my least favorite. What a terrible story.
 
As we're only looking at movies I - X, I'd say Generations. How do you manage to mess up Picard meeting Kirk?

By letting Picard meet Kirk. The very idea is messed up to begin with.

I read about a script that was written for Generations in which Kirk would only appear in the movie as a holodeck person that Picard would go to for help in dealing with a creature that's damaging our universe. Would you rather have Kirk appear only on the holodeck, thru the Nexus, or not at all?? Just curious...

Sounds like These Are The Voyages to me, and we've seen how that turned out.

Picard meeting Kirk is the prime example of fanwank.
 
There are a few that have disappointing aspects about them:

TMP - I know they were trying to be different from Star Wars, so as not to be seen as "cashing in" on its success, but some action and adventure would have been nice. Also Decker and Ilia were underused, and then needlessly gotten rid of at the end.

TSFS - The fact that they couldn't leave Spock resting in peace. Decker could have been brought back, or kept Saavik for the remaining films.

TFF - It was made.

GEN - Too much focus on "passing the torch".

INS - The whole premise of rogue Starfleet and a "fountain of youth" planet.

NEM - Worf suddenly back in uniform. Data is suddenly back to how he was in TNG. Shinzon and Picard having pointless discussions. B-4 retaining Data's memories.
 
You could hold Soran on suspicion of... something... and then after the Nexus has passed just go "OH WELL SORRY" and let him go.

Denial of personal liberty on a trumped up, phony charge? Doesn't sound very 24th century Starfleet to me.

While there's plenty of wiggle room when we're talking about a future fictional society, they're supposedly an outgrowth of our own cultures. As I've already pointed out in this thread "conspiracy to commit" could likely be brought up against Dr. Soran since he worked in collusion with the Duras sisters. In planning to extinguish the primary star of the Veridian system, I'm sure we're looking at conspiracy to commit genocide. Plus, I doubt lawmakers sat on their hands after Genesis; there must be some sort of environmental law against tampering with stars and planets on such a scale. How was the trilithium obtained? I doubt it was with the approval of the Romulans, who seemed intent on getting it back, so there might be fraud and theft charges appropriate to file against the Duras sisters and associates.

Working out the mechanics of shutting down the inner workings of a star should be a legal, though controversial undertaking. Obtaining the trilithium and putting it into a warhead and pointing it at a star?

I invite you to obtain plutonium, build an atomic bomb, and then transport it into New York City to experience an analogous set of circumstances in the real world.
 
You could hold Soran on suspicion of... something... and then after the Nexus has passed just go "OH WELL SORRY" and let him go.

Denial of personal liberty on a trumped up, phony charge? Doesn't sound very 24th century Starfleet to me.

It's not, which is why I can't see Picard ever doing something like that. For that matter he could've gone back in time and locked up Soran on the Enterprise B and Kirk never would've "died" in the first place.
 
The Motion Picture. For the first new live-action Trek in ten years and with a huge budget to work with, they go with a plot borrowed from "the changeling," throw in a half-hour special effects demo reel, and there you go, there's your movie after a ten-year wait, Star Trek fans!


Insurrection is pretty high up there, too.

With regardess to TMP, how much of that disappointment was down to too high an expectation of the movie itself to begin with. After all if a film is hyped to much all it can do is dissapoint.

As I've only seen from TVH onwards I can only say which of them dissapointed. Which would be TFF
 
Final Frontier.

Actually made me embarrassed to be a Trek fan.

I walked out at the end of Nemesis actually having enjoyed the movie. Wasn't until I got home and online that I found out I should've vomited or something.
 
Picard could of provide evidence to back that up right? And there'd be two Picards how to do explain that?

Just like there were two Picards when he came back with Kirk?

The evidence could be found in the missile site on Veridian III and the facilities on the Armagosa Observatory. Picard knows Soran's plan, and a torpedo armed with trilithium could be found there. He could have the Klingons ambushed before they killed the Romulans and question both groups for information about the source of the trilithium.

The Nexus is very flawed. The whole movie is flawed. What's to stop Soran, who is already there there, from doing the same thing that Picard wants to do. Leave the Nexus to fix things the way he wants them to be and yes, there would be 2 Picards. Another thing that always bugged me is when Riker tells Worf that they need a spread of torpedoes, why is only one torpedo fired? With all that being said, I still kinda liked the movie....at least up to the point where Picard goes into the Nexus.

This all sounds like the ending of Bill and Ted Go To Hell,* or whatever that flick was called. Everybody goes back in time one minute earlier to foil the others' plans ad infinitum.

(*My young son wanted to see that one, so I endured it out of duty. Still a painful memory.)
 
Most disappointing Trek film is easily Wrath of Khan. That pile of garbage has been played up as some second coming of the messiah for science fiction, and it's a movie I'd give a 3 or 4 out of 10 at best. Ties with Nemesis for amount of stupid developments that occur solely because the plot requires them to, though at least Nemesis definitely has more going for it overall.
 
I haven't really enjoyed a Trek film since the fourth one. :( :( :(

Trek works better ON TELEVISION. The novels, the comics, the films...more often than not...let me down. :( :( :(
 
I haven't really enjoyed a Trek film since the fourth one. :( :( :(

Trek works better ON TELEVISION. The novels, the comics, the films...more often than not...let me down. :( :( :(


I dunno. Percentage wise I think I approve of more film Trek than I do TV Trek. Especially considering I see three entire series as irredeemable trash.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top