I enjoyed Superman Returns when I saw it in the theater. Although I have not bothered to see it since... hmm.
The Bond films almost never mention the earlier films. Even those with the same actor.
Captaindemotion said:It's not simply that there's no reference to them. The main reason why SR is difficult to see as a sequel to III or IV is that Clark's mother had died in either III or IV but was still alive in Returns.
I do wonder why there are not more film franchises that go the James Bond route and just continue making sequels without bothering too much about what came before.
The Bond films tend to follow a continuity now because less people would be forgiving with the forgetting a previous films.
The new Bond films follow their own continuity, but don't tie into previous Bonds.
Using the same "M" as from the prior series.The new Bond films follow their own continuity, but don't tie into previous Bonds.
Yeah, Casino Royale was something of a "reboot."
He's not quite 100, but he's getting close. He was in his thirties back in the mid 1950s.It's not like James Bond is a 100 year old superhero who doesn't age.
Every Bond film is a "reboot".
Especially when the actors change.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.