Well, if they can't do more Harry Potters they can always start up a TIM HUNTER/BOOKS OF MAGIC series. All they need to do is intro Tim's friends Harmony and Don.
Finding out that the whole series was getting yet another bloody reboot after this film killed any anticipation for me. It'll all be superseded again. Bats 4 could have easily started to tie in to the rest of the DC Universe...
And the next Superman movie should have been Superman VI with Brandon Routh.
I do wonder why there are not more film franchises that go the James Bond route and just continue making sequels without bothering too much about what came before.
Finding out that the whole series was getting yet another bloody reboot after this film killed any anticipation for me. It'll all be superseded again. Bats 4 could have easily started to tie in to the rest of the DC Universe...
And the next Superman movie should have been Superman VI with Brandon Routh.
Actually Superman IV considering Singer's movie was ignoring Superman III and IV and just continuing the Donner movies ("counting" Superman II as a Donner movie.) And it's too soon to say the next Batman movie will be a complete "reboot" sure it'll have a new director, cast and such but we don't know yet if it'll completely ignore the events of the Nolan movies.
Superman Returns is loosly based on the Christopher Reeve films and uses them as a vague backstory. It's not supposed to be a sequel to II that ignores III and IV. That's just what circulates among fandom.
to each their own. It wasn't a very good movie anyway, so it's hardly worth the debate.
^ It's not simply that there's no reference to them. The main reason why SR is difficult to see as a sequel to III or IV is that Clark's mother had died in either III or IV but was still alive in Returns.
That is exactly what it is though. The use of "vague" and "loosely" just mean you don't have to have seen those movies to understand the plot.Superman Returns is loosly based on the Christopher Reeve films and uses them as a vague backstory. It's not supposed to be a sequel to II that ignores III and IV. That's just what circulates among fandom.
to each their own. It wasn't a very good movie anyway, so it's hardly worth the debate.
Oh that's not true - it may have been a bit light on action and excitement, but the character pieces were great, the cast were excellent and it looked good too. Rouths take on the Reeve part was superb...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.