Yeah, Bo's recognition of Din's references and then her male companion going "He's one of the Children of the Watch" and there's almost a full eye roll there. It was a nice texture of the different cultures within Mandalore.
Though worth keeping in mind; Bo-Katan and her group hardly qualify as "normal Mandalorian society". They're mostly former members of Death Watch (Sabine's parents included), and while they're not
religious extremists, they are (or at least were) much further along that political curve that what might pass for a Mandalorian centrist. I mean, even the name "Children of the Watch" echoes "The Death Watch" so clearly there's some association there.
Ever since season 1 of Mando, I've been operating under the assumption that the group of Mandos we were introduced to were a cult of extremists that are all that's left of Death Watch's religious arm, and so far that seems to have borne out.
While in practice it seemed little more than a platform to accrue personal power and influence, Vizla always did preach a return the the warrior traditions, so having him rally "The Children of the Watch" to his cause and putting them in charge of his child soldier fighting corps makes sense. It gives him more able bodies and base support to work with while at the same keeps the zealots like The Armorer too occupied to get on his case about keeping the stupid helmet on all the damn time.
Was the big moment mentioned up thread a few days ago Aunt Buru calling for Luke with Obi Wan looking on? Or was it Obi Wan killing Maul?
It was Chopper's dramatic sigh after deciding to stick with Ezra, obviously!
Also, I might be a little confused about what happened during the Obi Wan/Maul fight scene. Obi Wan kills him, and Maul asks about the Chosen One and he will avenge us. Was he talking about Luke or Vader?
He was talking about Luke. Obi-Wan believes Anakin is a lost cause even *after* he dies and becomes one with the universe. In his opinion, Luke is in fact the Chosen One. He's wrong, but he's not to know that.
ETA: This is IMO a very underrated aspect of Star Wars: the idea of the unreliable, or uninformed narrator.
In the real world, "History" is mostly just a version of events people have agreed on (and may change their mind about later), so an utterance, no matter how confidently spoken should never be taken as objective fact, and yet when it comes to fiction we've conditioned ourselves to accept information at face value.
Case in point: Darth Plagueis. For years we've assumed that he was Palpatine's Master, that he fiddled with midi-chorians, and was ultimately betrayed and murdered by his apprentice. Almost all of which in merely
inferred, and even then only alluded to in a single conversation with a party we as the audience know for a fact was actively attempting to deceive and manipulate.
For all we know, that whole thing is 100% pure kowakian monkey-lizard droppings. There may never have even been a Sith Lord by that name!