I'm not, and neither is Starfleet. It's apparent that "leave the enemy nothing" isn't their standard operating procedure, and there's a WORLD of difference between "top secret military technology that would give the enemy a strategic advantage!" and "something they need because they're desperate and starving." Those are two COMPLETELY different things.
No, you said, "food, oxygen and water are useful to the Klingons, but Starfleet does not glass entire planets just to keep the enemy from using them." If Geneva Conventions still exist in Star Trek, then that would explain why Starfleet does not glass entire planets.
The Shenzhou, however, was part of an armed force with "military-grade" technology, part of which happens to be a critical component in the Klingon flagship's warp propulsion system.
. . . On the other hand, they have no particular impetus to deliberately sabotage the SURVIVAL of those combatants once they have been immobilized.
Considering the part you quoted, what Convention/Protocol [and Article] specifically are you referring to or are you just making things up?
Otherwise, it's not a matter of deliberately sabotaging the enemy crew's survival but a matter of preventing or slowing down the repairs of their flagship with perfect cloak and devastating firepower, which was enough to destroy the surface of a class M planet. Leaving free technology behind could theoretically speed up the enemy's repairs in war time.
[If some convention or protocol played a role here, then the controlling power's fleet might have been able to capture or retrieve the Sarcophagus sooner. Unless, there was something else involved.]
It's easy to forget that this is an organization whose basic hand weapon has a non-lethal setting which they still use even in times of war.
Does this include the Assault Phaser?

There were several other facts established about phasers in general, but which might only relate to this model: a stun beam at close range to the skull can kill; phasers set on ‘wapourise,’ as Chekov calls it, set off internal sensors. . . .
. . . scuttling the ship accomplishes no strategic goal whatsoever and is both a waste of material and an unnecessary risk to the crew.
From the debate so far, it sounds like the strategic goal would be to prevent or slow down the enemy flagship's repairs in time of war, so it can't rejoin the fleet, or rejoin it as fast, to help turn the tide of war.
Additionally, why was the Sarcophagus left stranded for six months without attention from either side? It was the Klingon flagship with perfect cloak and devastating firepower, in combination with its symbolic meaning. If Starfleet initially had to retreat, then that gives motivation to the Klingon fleet to check on their flagship much sooner. And if the issue is that it's the Federation territory, then that gives motivation to Starfleet to capture the vessel and retrieve the Shenzhou while at it.
Perhaps there is something else to consider.

Last edited: