Except that VHS and even DVD look crappy on a large HD TV.
Well that's people's fault for buying large HD TVs then.
Except that VHS and even DVD look crappy on a large HD TV.
I really hope this is not a serious statement.Except that VHS and even DVD look crappy on a large HD TV.
Well that's people's fault for buying large HD TVs then.
Except that VHS and even DVD look crappy on a large HD TV.
Well that's people's fault for buying large HD TVs then.
Why is it hard to understand? I, and many other people, want the original movies -as they appeared in their first runs- on the best-quality available format for this day-and-age, that being Blue-Ray disc.
Except that VHS and even DVD look crappy on a large HD TV.
Well that's people's fault for buying large HD TVs then.
Yes it's our fault for buying the latest format for Televisions.
....![]()
Why is it hard to understand? I, and many other people, want the original movies -as they appeared in their first runs- on the best-quality available format for this day-and-age, that being Blue-Ray disc.
You can want whatever. You are owed nothing by Lucas. It's his call. That some don't like it is immaterial to him I imagine.
One thing he can't be called is greedy in this case since he could offer both and surely make more.
Well then you patently don't want to see the original movies. You want to see some kind of pixie-dust-enhanced zombie version of the original movies, something that could not have existed thirty years ago.Why is it hard to understand? I, and many other people, want the original movies -as they appeared in their first runs- on the best-quality available format for this day-and-age, that being Blue-Ray disc.
Why is it hard to understand? I, and many other people, want the original movies -as they appeared in their first runs- on the best-quality available format for this day-and-age, that being Blue-Ray disc.
You can want whatever. You are owed nothing by Lucas. It's his call. That some don't like it is immaterial to him I imagine.
One thing he can't be called is greedy in this case since he could offer both and surely make more.
Fans may not be owed anything by Lucas but it would certainly be a nice gesture on his part to listen to the them since they helped get him where he is today.
I don't see why he can't include the original theatrical cut or even release it separately. It's like going to see a Bruce Springsteen concert and only getting to hear material from his new album.
Well then you patently don't want to see the original movies. You want to see some kind of pixie-dust-enhanced zombie version of the original movies, something that could not have existed thirty years ago.Why is it hard to understand? I, and many other people, want the original movies -as they appeared in their first runs- on the best-quality available format for this day-and-age, that being Blue-Ray disc.
Well then you patently don't want to see the original movies. You want to see some kind of pixie-dust-enhanced zombie version of the original movies, something that could not have existed thirty years ago.Why is it hard to understand? I, and many other people, want the original movies -as they appeared in their first runs- on the best-quality available format for this day-and-age, that being Blue-Ray disc.
Well then you patently don't want to see the original movies. You want to see some kind of pixie-dust-enhanced zombie version of the original movies, something that could not have existed thirty years ago.Why is it hard to understand? I, and many other people, want the original movies -as they appeared in their first runs- on the best-quality available format for this day-and-age, that being Blue-Ray disc.
I'm getting the awful feeling you're like one of those people on the forums at Theforce.net that made me leave there when the "bonus" DVDs came out, because all the Lucas sycophants were defending the decision, saying that movies made before the creation of DVD couldn't be made 16x9 for DVD.
Please tell me you're not one of those horrifically misinformed people? Please tell me you're aware of movies like Close Encounters of the Third Kind (theatrical release 1977, special edition re-release 1980, director's cut release 1998), which has all three cuts on DVD and Bluray. Please tell me that you're aware of movies like BladeRunner (1982 theatrical release, 1992 director's cut re-release) which has FIVE! versions on the DVD and Bluray sets? Please tell me you're aware of every other widescreen movie made before 1977 which can somehow, amazingly, miraculously be issued in 16x9 on DVD and Bluray, yet for some bizarre reason the original Star Wars films cannot?
Please?
Well then you patently don't want to see the original movies. You want to see some kind of pixie-dust-enhanced zombie version of the original movies, something that could not have existed thirty years ago.
I'm getting the awful feeling you're like one of those people on the forums at Theforce.net that made me leave there when the "bonus" DVDs came out, because all the Lucas sycophants were defending the decision, saying that movies made before the creation of DVD couldn't be made 16x9 for DVD.
Please tell me you're not one of those horrifically misinformed people? Please tell me you're aware of movies like Close Encounters of the Third Kind (theatrical release 1977, special edition re-release 1980, director's cut release 1998), which has all three cuts on DVD and Bluray. Please tell me that you're aware of movies like BladeRunner (1982 theatrical release, 1992 director's cut re-release) which has FIVE! versions on the DVD and Bluray sets? Please tell me you're aware of every other widescreen movie made before 1977 which can somehow, amazingly, miraculously be issued in 16x9 on DVD and Bluray, yet for some bizarre reason the original Star Wars films cannot?
Please?
Of course it physically could assuming there's an original, non-destroyed print out there. Hell, "The Wizard of OZ" looks great on blu-ray. I don't think anyone doubts that it'd be possible.
The creator of the 'saga' doesn't want it. Didn't Kubrick purposefully destroy all sorts of production material for 2001 so a film sequel could not be made? (it was anyway)
Lucas has made his choice. I'm not saying it's my preferred outcome but it's certainly his choice. I don't hate him for that, or dislike him, even.
So it's Congress's fault! Damn Republicans!The are prints in the library congress of the entire OT. They aren't the original negatives, but they would be good enough to create a satisfactory Blu-Ray release of the theatrical editions, I think.
and george gets to keep the copyrights to star wars till 2072. so get over it.
You can want whatever. You are owed nothing by Lucas. It's his call. That some don't like it is immaterial to him I imagine.
One thing he can't be called is greedy in this case since he could offer both and surely make more.
Fans may not be owed anything by Lucas but it would certainly be a nice gesture on his part to listen to the them since they helped get him where he is today.
I don't see why he can't include the original theatrical cut or even release it separately. It's like going to see a Bruce Springsteen concert and only getting to hear material from his new album.
As others have said, he HAS released the theatrical cut. It was a bonus on the last DVD release.
The Boss will play what he wants to play. Some artist DON'T want to always play their hits. And they don't.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.