It was more than just "moms and girls" that made Barbie the hit it was, I saw tons of guys talking about it after it came out.
I want to be Ken.
Sure he's a vapid moron with no penis, but those glistening abs on his frontside are a marvel.
It was more than just "moms and girls" that made Barbie the hit it was, I saw tons of guys talking about it after it came out.
Oh, all over YouTube, getting clicks and shares from Lex's Void Monkeys.It's funny how WB 13 years was chasing that "One billion" box office recognition but now are content with $562.5M
Where's all the doom and gloom and quietly sacking James Gunn for underperforming?
Warner's DCEU billion dollar movie was..... Aquaman.
The part WB never seemed to get is Marvel didnt sniff a billion until Avengers. The movies prior to that was always in a respectable 300 to 400 million range. The audience needed time to get to like the characters first before putting them in a team up movie.It's funny how WB 13 years was chasing that "One billion" box office recognition but now are content with $562.5M
Where's all the doom and gloom and quietly sacking James Gunn for underperforming?
It's just hilarious.
2013 - $670,145,518 for Man of Steel
WB- Quick! Get the guy who directed ARGO and400 ditch plans for "Man of Steel 2" We're going to rush our build up of the Justice League and cast Batman, Wonder Woman, The Flash, Aquaman and Cyborg
Indeed they are!I want to be Ken.
Sure he's a vapid moron with no penis, but those glistening abs on his frontside are a marvel.
I think we need to make Void Monkeys a new name for internet trolls and other forms of online idiots.Oh, all over YouTube, getting clicks and shares from Lex's Void Monkeys.
And the next most successful was Wonder Woman, at over 800 million.
The formula for producing a successful Snyderverse film was not having Snyder write or direct.![]()
Nolan has consistently made great films for the past twenty five years. He has also brought out great performances from actors. His one commercial flop was due to the pandemic, not the quality of the film.
My evidence?
quote) "...to all the kids (girls and moms)".
Being unsure about streaming release is a big thing, if folks aren't 100% sure it will be on a streaming service in 1 month then they're more likely to go see it.
Marvel fanatics will never own up to the fact that so many of their recent movies have been the sh@ts.
If the movie is good, it has legs and everyone goes to see it.
If it sucks, the film dies. Period. Marvel's brand has been damaged from churning out too many mediocre or bad films and its going to take time to get that good will back.
I want to be Ken.
Sure he's a vapid moron with no penis, but those glistening abs on his frontside are a marvel.
Did Kara beat up Superman again?
I too had a chuckle when WB announced their scaled back expectations of Superman (2025). MOS’s expectation of the studio was $750-800 million. Superman (2025), they’re good if it just makes $500 million worldwide. Obviously stated to control the narrative about the film’s performance. At this rate, it’s not going to catch MOS, The Batman (2022) or any of the three GOTG movies James Gunn wrote and directed.It's funny how WB 13 years was chasing that "One billion" box office recognition but now are content with $562.5M
Where's all the doom and gloom and quietly sacking James Gunn for underperforming?
It's just hilarious.
2013 - $670,145,518 for Man of Steel
WB- Quick! Get the guy who directed ARGO and ditch plans for "Man of Steel 2" We're going to rush our build up of the Justice League and cast Batman, Wonder Woman, The Flash, Aquaman and Cyborg
Man of Steel’s competition was a lot stiffer back in 2013.
Summer 2013 was supersaturated (no pun intended) with a lot of competitive action films.
Most definitely.It is just a much different market now. It is tough to make an apples-to-apples comparison.
See? It is possible to like more than one of these two versions after all.![]()
Well…I like variety. But I think we can all agree that Doctor Who really hit the skids with Tom Baker and never really recovered.How dare you have a reasonable, mature view on both sides of the debate?!
Especially this debate?
And I say that as someone who is emphatically not a fan of Synder.
Except Jon Pertwee.No one can replace Patrick Troughton.
Just rewatched Man of Steel to see if it still holds up. It does to me. Don’t worry. I’m not planning to do a blow by blow comparison or argue it’s better than Superman.
In short, I like each film because they are successful at telling the story the directors wanted to tell. Also, I find each of the stories and approaches interesting in and of themselves. So while I’m fully aware some heavily favour one over the other, I don’t. If forced to choose, I slightly prefer Man of Steel because I find its premise a bit more compelling—but I’m talking a 51/49 split here. And I look forward to the next instalment by Gunn with great anticipation.
- I thoroughly enjoyed each film.
- I’m not at all attempting to persuade anyone who doesn’t like Man of Steel to change their mind.
- I think box office number arguments are pointless as the industry and society’s consumption, for lack of a better term, of movies has changed significantly enough between each film to render such comparisons obsolete (like comparing different sports eras).
I’ll always wish Cavill had gotten at least one more kick at the can (solo movie) but I also hope Corenswet (sp?) gets a long run as well.
See? It is possible to like more than one of these two versions after all.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.