Not always.it's done for a reason (the reason being it's getting the axe soon).
Discovery Season 2 was announced before Season 1 even aired.
Not always.it's done for a reason (the reason being it's getting the axe soon).
Not always.
Discovery Season 2 was announced before Season 1 even aired.
Not always.
Discovery Season 2 was announced before Season 1 even aired.
That would be entirely correct. But it hasn't happened, so I don't see the relevance. If a hypothetical Legacy show featured the Enterprise-C in a flashback and said it was a Constitution-II.V class, that would be bad for continuity. But it's a complete hypothetical.This is a bit more targeted. I was specifically referring to a theoretical situation where we get quite literally a rebooted TOS with Kirk's Enterprise.
At that point, the two shows become completely incompatible, the original version of TOS would be default have to be removed from the continuity.
That would be entirely correct. But it hasn't happened, so I don't see the relevance. If a hypothetical Legacy show featured the Enterprise-C in a flashback and said it was a Constitution-II.V class, that would be bad for continuity. But it's a complete hypothetical.
So, having thought on this a little bit here's my approach and Paramount's attitude can go pound sand (as can other fans).
One timeline: TOS to VOY, with some exceptions (TMP being notable).
Second timeline: diverged when the Borg go back in time in First Contact. Splinters like Parallel branches to Enterprise, in to Discovery, to Strange New Worlds. Discovery likely went to this branch but that's debatable. Events of TOS will happen in a similar manner, characters and events but tech was changed with ongoing Temporal Time War shenanigans.
Outliers: Kelvin (obviously), Prodigy, Lower Decks (events happened but not as depicted).
If one has to take TOS as strict literal history occurring as it happened on screen this is my approach.
Outliers: Kelvin (obviously), Prodigy, Lower Decks (events happened but not as depicted).
If one has to take TOS as strict literal history occurring as it happened on screen this is my approach.
I never really thought the original bridge needed many changes to be acceptable for modern audiences. Different lighting, more interactive displays replacing the old static pictures, and maybe a slight size increase to accommodate the camera angles used for a "cinematic" approach.I actually don't have an issue with Prodigy, and my issues with Lower Decks in regards to how it fits in with the rest of the continuity of the fictional setting are with plot/character elements rather than visuals.
I don't need to be *THAT* literal as to say that Lower Decks people are literally two dimensional animated people. There is absolutely a level of adjusting for the medium the work is presented in.
It's difficult to truly articulate my preference for how to tackle the TOS era, but in broad strokes it's not "Make it literally exactly as presented on 1960's television", but rather... make the designs as close as is feasibly possible. Keep the same shapes of things. Add detail, texture, lighting as necessary. There is really no reason the Enterprise couldn't just be the Enterprise. Go ham on lighting, add some more in-depth texturing to it, render the ever loving hell out of it. But the shape really doesn't need to change.
Things like uniforms and what not? I'm satisfied with SNW's take. Those hit "close enough" to me. They aren't exact... but many of them are damn well close enough.
Things like the bridge and interior spaces? Probably the more problematic areas to truly replicate, but I think they could be closer without going too much. At the very least, I would preferred capturing the spirit. The Enterprise always seemed to be somewhat crowded, cramped even. SNW Enterprise has a huge, sprawling bar. Pike's quarters is bigger than my house. I think they could have downsized a bit, used a color scheme closer to the original, etc.
I will say though, Discovery kind of ruined me a bit. Had this new era of Trek started with SNW... i'd probably be less antagonistic. SNW does look good and is generally a good show, and it comes MUCH closer to actually trying to evoke TOS than Discovery ever did. Honestly I think even with SNW... if they didn't mess with the ship as much and the Enterprise was just.. the Enterprise, I probably would be mostly fine. That truly is my biggest gripe with SNW.
I am slowly just accepting that this is what it is now.
To me, it didn't.But the shape really doesn't need to change.
Kirk and Spock are too different to me, plus the rapid refit of the Enterprise, plus the uniforms, plus the new characters who practically take over.I like this, but I would also add the possibility that the timeline can snap back on itself when a new temporal incursion occurs, hence why the TOS aesthetic was shown in PIC S3. It's like ripples bouncing back when they hit another obstacle.
One question though, why not TMP??
Which is why I set it out as different. The purpose of it is a sitcom, ab exaggeration of in universe events rather than a literal history.with Lower Decks in regards to how it fits in with the rest of the continuity of the fictional setting are with plot/character elements rather than visuals.
I see this a lot and it just baffles me. Discovery is a departure in some ways, but I don't let it color my view of other Trek. It just is a different take on a universe I like.will say though, Discovery kind of ruined me a bit.
there is possibly 10-15 years in-universe between TMP and TWOK if that helps.It's not a good line up and then going from TMP to TWOK makes it more difficult for me.
Possibly being the operative word. It's not explicit.there is possibly 10-15 years in-universe between TMP and TWOK if that helps.
Oof... I'm not saying you're wrong, but I certainly hope for a fifth season.
SNW could continue beyond five seasons.
There's a second leading man in the wings for it.
![]()
It could even cover the years after TOS Season 3.
Are we going to do Star Trek '09 all over again?![]()
Yes.Are we going to do Star Trek '09 all over again?![]()
I never really thought the original bridge needed many changes to be acceptable for modern audiences. Different lighting, more interactive displays replacing the old static pictures, and maybe a slight size increase to accommodate the camera angles used for a "cinematic" approach.
I actually liked the mentality used when they updated the TWOK uniform for S1.
A little extra detail along the sleeve, but the shape stays the same. (Although I'm still not entirely sold on the flap angle)
That's the way I'd update things set in an already-seen era of Trek. You just add detail, but keep the silhouette.
To me, it didn't.
The uniforms are more egregious to me.
Which is why I set it out as different. The purpose of it is a sitcom, ab exaggeration of in universe events rather than a literal history.
I see this a lot and it just baffles me. Discovery is a departure in some ways, but I don't let it color my view of other Trek. It just is a different take on a universe I like.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.