It is inappropriate to refer to anything written by a professional author as "fan fiction."Novelverse = Authorized fan fiction
It is inappropriate to refer to anything written by a professional author as "fan fiction."Novelverse = Authorized fan fiction
Even professionals can write something truly awful and laden with the most prototypical fanfiction tropes so it can be a valid criticism.It is inappropriate to refer to anything written by a professional author as "fan fiction."
So there was no fanbase then you showed up and suddenly there was a fanbase...
I'm on to you.
Well, me and two other kids in my 7th grade homeroom, yeah.

Yeah we know. see post # 18192word on the street is that star trek strange new worlds season 5 will have sulu and checkoff but they will only appear in the very last episode of season 5 when captain james tiberius kirk takes over for chris pike to run the enter prize
No, Unionized Elf is correct. Such characterizations are rhetorically incoherent.Even professionals can write something truly awful and laden with the most prototypical fanfiction tropes so it can be a valid criticism.
It is inappropriate to refer to anything written by a professional author as "fan fiction."
Even professionals can write something truly awful and laden with the most prototypical fanfiction tropes so it can be a valid criticism.

You mean the news that's been announced by the producers and covered by every trade website and is all over social media for a couple of days?
That "street?"
Stupid people posting stupid things...I seem to recall no shortage of people calling Jack Crusher a "Gary Stu".![]()
If someone gets the news from their phone while in their car I think they technically could say they got the news on the street.You mean the news that's been announced by the producers and covered by every trade website and is all over social media for a couple of days?
That "street?"
>Terry Matalas and Picard season 3 have entered the chat<Even professionals can write something truly awful and laden with the most prototypical fanfiction tropes so it can be a valid criticism.
It is inappropriate to refer to anything written by a professional author as "fan fiction."
And? How does that relevant to referring to professional works as fan fiction or how does that justify calling something written by a professional fan fiction.I seem to recall no shortage of people calling Jack Crusher a "Gary Stu".![]()
Hint: if your defense is basically "other people do it" you've already lost the argument.

Even professionals can write something truly awful and laden with the most prototypical fanfiction tropes so it can be a valid criticism.
Doesn't matter one bit.Star Smashers of the Galaxy Rangers, anyone?
Speaking of which, how do fan fiction writers feel about seeing someone dismiss professional work that they find somehow lacking as "fan fiction," as if that's a big putdown?
The genre of fanfiction can be differentiated from just amateur fiction by its tropes. And sometimes professionals do a really shit job and produce works that have more in common with such negative tropes than should be expected in a professional body of work. It is a fair critique if explained and phrased properly.Speaking of which, how do fan fiction writers feel about seeing someone dismiss professional work that they find somehow lacking as "fan fiction," as if that's a big putdown?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.