IIRC, Terry Farrell had an allergic reaction to the forehead prosthetic, which is what necessitated a new look for the Trill.They did test out the TNG Trill makeup.
![]()
IIRC, Terry Farrell had an allergic reaction to the forehead prosthetic, which is what necessitated a new look for the Trill.They did test out the TNG Trill makeup.
![]()
Same can be said about the Klingons.Here you go, they're a completely different race described with the same word, like how Changelings and Chameloids are both shapeshifters. You can trace the word's origin to the Trill species who live on Trill, but they're not the only 'trill'. Solved.
That just sounds like a baked-in excuse to move the goalposts to suit your argument.It really isn't an all or nothing deal. You can't expect perfection, people forget things, life gets in the way. There will always be a thousand things you can nitpick, that's just how it is. But you can expect creators to make a proper effort to remain consistent with what has already been established and you can definitely expect fans to be unhappy when they don't.
Never say never. Though I got to say I kind of like the idea of just doing alternate universes that are still sort of connected but not really connected. I would so love right now if SNW actually embraced the idea it's not in the Prime Universe and changed Pike's fate. My favorite idea for the show right now is still the idea of the show killing Captain Kirk in the season final and maybe doing some other big change like Spock and Chapel getting married.Star Trek will never become detached from the Prime Universe. Even they attempted a reboot with the Kelvin movies, they established it as an alternate timeline which branched off of the Prime Universe in order to allow Leonard Nimoy to make cameos.
As they should. What with him being the star and all.Well SNW Kirk is not exactly Shatner KIrk. I think on SNW people much prefer Pike to their version of Kirk.
And?Well SNW Kirk is not exactly Shatner KIrk. I think on SNW people much prefer Pike to their version of Kirk.
If you subscribe to the belief that transporter upgrades are the reason the transporter effect changes, than the Starfleet transporters we see on DS9 have not been upgraded since TNG times, as they have the exact same effect used in TNG.Isn't it possible that transporter technology simply improved between TNG and DS9 to at least explain that aspect of the Trill discrepancy?
If you've accepted you can't expect perfection, you've also waived your right to complain when you don't get it.It really isn't an all or nothing deal. You can't expect perfection, people forget things, life gets in the way. There will always be a thousand things you can nitpick, that's just how it is. But you can expect creators to make a proper effort to remain consistent with what has already been established and you can definitely expect fans to be unhappy when they don't.
I'd settle for all Trek being treated somewhat equally.If you've accepted you can't expect perfection, you've also waived your right to complain when you don't get it.
Alas, amongst a fandom where "hate the current product, worship the older stuff as perfection" appears to be policy, that's never going to happen.I'd settle for all Trek being treated somewhat equally.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.