We all have our limits.If people bitching about a show I like made me stop I would have bailed during Enterprise.
We all have our limits.If people bitching about a show I like made me stop I would have bailed during Enterprise.
Then maybe saying calm down might not be the best response...?
Historically, special guest star billing has sometimes been used to give prominent billing to an actor who was very much a series regular. See Jonathan Harris in Lost in Space, and Martin Landau in the first season of Mission: Impossible.As far as I'm concerned, anyone billed as a guest star or special guest star is in no way a regular.
Maybe it's not. It's where I'm at.You're flying out the handle, figuratively, over something that is a year in the future and may play well. None of us know. It just doesn't seem healthy to react that way to entertainment.
Historically, special guest star billing has sometimes been used to give prominent billing to an actor who was very much a series regular. See Jonathan Harris in Lost in Space, and Martin Landau in the first season of Mission: Impossible.
Up on blocks in the front yard waiting for parts.
They make car covers that size?
Nope. Open to the elements. Gonna need a new paint job too,
IIRC, when Yeoh's casting was first announced, the report identified her as a "recurring character." Which, at least in modern television is distinct from being a regular. The only thing unique about her status is that though billed as a Special Guest Star in all her appearances, she was listed in the opening credits, making her the only "guest star" on Disco to have been.The actual question is, how is the actor being paid - per appearance or for a season. SMG's paid for every episode of STD aired. Was Yeoh paid to do more than six or seven episodes in the first year? Was she guaranteed the appearances?
I know I did.Sorry, but I think I just teared up a little when the TOS theme played at the end.
Since Kirk seems to be in a scene with Ms. Noonien-Singh, option 3 is that he's in one or more flashbacks about her.The weird thing about this IMHO is he's a relatively big name that you don't just pick for a guest star role...yet his age kinda boxes him out of a lot of things, presuming Mount actually wants to have a decent run on Strange New Worlds.
I mean, there are basically two options.
- He is meant to play Kirk at this time, meaning he's playing a character who is 15 years younger than he is. Sure he's a well-preserved 39, but if Mount stays on as Pike for 5 years or more, he's going to start being visibly middle aged.
- Another possibility is that he's playing a "future Kirk" who has time-skipped back for some reason. This is intriguing, but it offers additional complications unless they want to just use him as a one-off, as there are a ton of SNW cast members who should also be on Kirk's Enterprise, and would thus have to be aged up a bit for the next spin off series.
OH MY GOD! How has this never come up before? PERFECT!Surely memberberries in Trek should be calling roddenberries.![]()
Anson's a kick.Took a look at Anson Mount's and Paul Wesley's Twitter feeds and found these:
Go ask Guy Williams.How the hell can you claim someone who had "Special Guest Star" above their name was a regular and not a guest star?
One of my female friends back in 2009 when she saw ads for STXI: It's the guy from Princess Diaries 2!!!What pedigree? "The Vampire Diaries", "Smallville" and a few YA films most of which I barely have heard of?
Ok, honest question that I mean sincerely, how do they use Kirk in a way that a) doesn't suck and b) doesn't overshadow Pike?
I fear you're right.Pike was one of the best things about DSC Season 2 and I would have been more than willing to go on an episodic journey with him, Number One, and Spock with SNW had the people behind the series not started spiraling down the rabbit hole of making the show nothing more than TOS 2.0 with the unnecessary inclusion of Uhura, M'Benga, a Kahn, and now Kirk.
I see no evidence that the inclusion of those characters will be a bad thing any more than the inclusion of Sarek, Amanda, Spock and Pike were a bad thing for DISCO.I fear you're right.
^ If you say so.
By not using him at all.
I do.I see no evidence that the inclusion of those characters will be a bad thing any more than the inclusion of Sarek, Amanda, Spock and Pike were a bad thing for DISCO.
Rogue One was absolutely awful, and nearly defines hamfisted, if not quite fully negative.It's all in how you use a legacy character. Darth Vader keeps finding a way into new Disney series and films but there are precious few instances in which his inclusion has been negative and hamfisted.
I see no evidence that the inclusion of those characters will be a bad thing any more than the inclusion of Sarek, Amanda, Spock and Pike were a bad thing for DISCO.
M'Benga was in the same amount of TOS episodes as Pike and Number One.Pike was one of the best things about DSC Season 2 and I would have been more than willing to go on an episodic journey with him, Number One, and Spock with SNW had the people behind the series not started spiraling down the rabbit hole of making the show nothing more than TOS 2.0 with the unnecessary inclusion of Uhura, M'Benga, a Kahn, and now Kirk.
Is this meant to be reverse psychology? It's the only thing that makes sense right now.I do.
Them's the breaks.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.