SNW is SET in the TOS era 7 years (and decreasing) before Where No Man Has Gone Before so IMO including the characters from that era is fine.Okay; they weren't doing "lots and lots" (you might even say "abundant") callbacks/refernces from TOS in TNG S1 & S2.
It's just such a whack criticism to level at TNG, especially when you're praising SNW which is, very deliberately and by its own aims, a TOS tribute act which revisits plots and characters wholesale, up to and including remixing existing episodes. Doubly so when the "lots and lots" of callbacks are relegated chiefly to the first two episodes and then end up reaching for "Troi is Ilya".
I'm not sure why your original post went off about Picard as well - yeah, he's a dickhead, I hate him too, but it seemed like you just wanted to rag on TNG by any means necessary, even if it was totally beside the point.
TNG was set 100 years AFTER that era - yet wen see Type 7 Shuttlecraft models and old stye props in the background of many a TNG S! scene; and a out and out clone of a TOS character in TNG S2.
I go off on Picard and the other 24th century characters because in general, when written to Gene's Vision™ UNLIKE the characters from TOS, they're pretty much unrelatable to the viewer. And yeah, Picard's 'Hollier Than Thou' has always bothered me - especially when he doesn't follow his own advice.
I've said this about my relationship with TNG in that I too ultimately grew to accept it for what it became and called it Star Trek, but as I've seen what they managed to do with ST: D S2 and SNW in its entirety to date, yeah, I've grown much more sour on 24th century Berman era Trek (with the exception of DS9) and TNG in particular as I find less and less TNG episodes I'd bother to rewatch anymore - but that's me.
