• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Strange New Worlds 1x01 - "Strange New Worlds"

Rate the Episode

  • 1 - Excellent

    Votes: 147 45.9%
  • 2

    Votes: 81 25.3%
  • 3

    Votes: 60 18.8%
  • 4

    Votes: 12 3.8%
  • 5

    Votes: 5 1.6%
  • 6

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • 7

    Votes: 5 1.6%
  • 8

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • 9

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 10 - Terrible

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    320
  • Poll closed .
Overall, I'd rank the Kurtzman-era premiere episodes like this:

Prodigy
Picard
Strange New Worlds
Discovery
-
-
-
Lower Decks
 
Which implies that future historians also view the extremes on both sides as being culpable, whatever we feel about them now.

The matter is also complicated by the fact that the episode shows street demonstrations on Kiley, which apparently represent the opposition to the government.

And then Pike shows images of American street demonstrations, most easily identified by the placards and colors as being right-wingers (there's one shot of a night demonstration, with fires burning, that might be something else).

So a visual connection is drawn, however inadvertently, between those who oppose the Kileyite government, and the "Audit the Vote" folks.

And who on Kiley digit-digit-digit is threatening to use a warp bomb to maintain order? Well, apparently not the street demonstrators. It's the government.

We pretty much know what side of the argument most people working on this show probably embrace. The majority of us on this BBS probably line up with those causes, and we "know" what they meant to say. That does not mean they made choices that unambiguously communicate that, and it was probably deliberate.
 
I'm torn on the history lesson Pike gives. On the one hand, it's very heavy-handed and will date the episode. On the other, it will annoy groups who shall not be named outside of TNZ and that makes me happy.
Actually for me it's the reverse. I don't mind the heavy-handedness but if the aforementioned group could latch on to Trek and its ideology, it would better than to antagonise them.
 
Actually for me it's the reverse. I don't mind the heavy-handedness but if the aforementioned group could latch on to Trek and its ideology, it would better than to antagonise them.
Wouldn't that be nice if people were not so broad sweeping in such generalizations and encourage ideological exploration?
 
Trying to keep 30 million people alive after a plague that does not affect physical infrastructure or ecology is a very different question than trying to keep 5 billion people alive when nuclear weapons have devastated your physical infrastructure and your ecology.
True, but then entire cities were destroyed in some wars and were soon rebuilt. Think Athens or Dresden. The point is that we can and have survived and prospered following enormous devastation and loss.

So did DIS and PIC.
Where? DS9's entire story arc is about this. Aside from fleeting moments, where do those other series do this?

Characters on DS9 spent a larger percentage of their time moping than you're implying, and characters on DIS and PIC spend a smaller percentage of their time moping than you're implying.
Spend entire arcs in gloom mode? No way.
 
Actually for me it's the reverse. I don't mind the heavy-handedness but if the aforementioned group could latch on to Trek and its ideology, it would better than to antagonise them.
I think the heavy-handedness doesn't bother me as much as it making the episode feel a bit dated.
 
We now know that the Eiffel Tower from the base up had to be reconstructed. Although many classical works of art and literature seem to have escaped destruction so by 2053 perhaps many of them had already been shuttled off to more secure locations in case of war or terrorist attack.
The art and literature were saved by PAX from Roddenberry's "Genesis II" and "Planet Earth.":hugegrin:
 
True, but then entire cities were destroyed in some wars and were soon rebuilt. Think Athens or Dresden. The point is that we can and have survived and prospered following enormous devastation and loss.
It doesn't seem like you're considering the nuclear fallout after such a war. That would create an ongoing hazard. Not to mention, nuclear winter. The years after such a war would be harsh.

I'm not thinking that a nuclear war, even a limited one, is a good prescription for "prospering!"
 
Well isnt discovery about 10 years from TOS? Season 2 was just after one and SNW is just a few months after season 2 disc. Pike says about 10 years. Right?? So it seems to fit. Plus it happened mid season 1 of TOS...

SNW season 1 is in 2259, 'about 10 years' after 2259 would still be after 'The Menagerie'
 
A very promising start. There are a few minor quibbles but I'm going to overlook them simply because they are offset in my view by the fact this feels like a Star Trek episode, and that's something I haven't ever felt about the other 2 current series.
 
They made some reference to "cloth samples" or something being in the transporter buffer... or something - I still need to re-watch.

Now, WHY they decided to do that instead of just dressing them correctly before transport is a bit of a mystery.
It's cooler.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top